TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction

Chapter I

Early History of Germany

Antiquity of the German Reich

Germans Shape World Affairs

The Answer Found

Did the Assyrians Invade Europe?

What Did Assyrians Look Like?

Why Germans Call Themselves "Deutschen"

What Language Did They Speak?

Semitic by Race, Not Language

Chapter II

The Ancient Kings of the Germans

The Early Settlers of Europe

Kings of Ancient Germany

Chapter III

Abraham in Early European History

Europe's Early History Suppressed

Abraham in the Austrian Chronicle

Chapter IV

Jews Gain Power in Danube Civilization

Jewish Kings from Austrian Chronicle

End of Jewish Predominance

Chapter V

The Conquests of Odin and Danish History

What the History of Denmark Reveals

The Genealogy of Dan I

"Hu the Mighty"

The Kings of Denmark

Denmark Enters Roman History

Christianity Introduced on the Throne

Chapter VI

Scotland -- Key to History of New World

What Historians Claim

First Major Settlement

Line of Judah in Scotland

Earliest History of Scotland

Early Line of Scottish Kings

Kings of Cruithne Continued

Chapter VII

They Crossed the Atlantic

The Little Ice Age

Whites Did Not Become Indians

American Indian Tradition

Enter Votan

Early Time of Migration

Chronology of Mexico

The History of Toltecs at Tullan

The City-State of Culhaucan

The Chichimecs at Texcoco

The Aztecs

Chapter VIII

The History of Spain

Only Recently Suppressed

Earliest Kings over the Spanish

Invasion from Africa

Abraham's Children

Chaos in Spain

Time of the Sea Powers

Chapter IX

Italy, Home of Pagan Religion

Italy in the Ancient World

What Italian History Reveals

The History of Etruria

The History of the Latins

Chapter X

The Story of the Peruvian Indians

Modern Scholarship Discarded the Facts

What Archaeologists Found

Illustration from Burma

The Inca Rulers

Chapter XI

Ancient Persia and Turkestan

Early Kings of Persia

The Second Race

The First Race

Turkestan, Turks and Mongols

Ogus Khan

The History of Armenia

Chapter XII

Trojan Migration to France

Trojan Kings of Isauria

Trojan Kings of Sicambria and Pannonia

Kings of Agrippina

Princes of Brabant

Dukes of Brabant

Kings of Frisia

Dukes of Frisia

Second Group of Kings of Frisia

Trojan Kings of the Belgians

Kings of the Celts in Gaul

Chapter XII A

Further Migrations to France

Sicambrian Kings

The Kings of the Franks

Dukes of the East Franks

The Hapsburgs Enter

The Dukes of Gaul

Kings of France

In Retrospect

Chapter XIII

History of Sweden and the Saxons

The Record Speaks

Renewed Migration

Dynasty of Yngling

Dynasty of Stenkil

Saxon History

Chapter XIV

The History of Arabia

Who Were the First Arabs?

The Jorhamites of Hejaz

The Kingdom of Yemen

Arabia's Indian-Ocean Neighbors

Chapter XV

The Miracle of the Red Sea

Do Miracles Happen Today?

Background of the Story

Where Is Goshen?

The Land of Rameses

Goshen During the Plagues

The Night of the Exodus

Israel Built Pyramids

What Road Did Israel Take?

Where Are These Places?

Crossing the Red Sea

Egypt Left Desolate

Egypt's Historians Admit What Happened

Chapter XVI

Journey to Petra

After Mount Sinai -- Where?

What Does "Kadesh" Mean?

Located in Mount Seir!

Israel Whipped in Seir

Yet Another Proof!

Where Was the "Wilderness of Wandering"?

Encampments Listed in Order

Bene-Jaakan is Kadesh!

The Return to Kadesh

"Sela" Another Name for Petra

Where Did Aaron Die?

Where Was the King's Highway?

Journey Northward in the Arabah

Petra Occupied by Israel

Chapter XVII

Where Did the Twelve Apostles Go?

Jesus' Commission Tells

"House of Israel" Identified

What New Testament Reveals

Three Missing Words

Wars Reveal Where

To Whom Did Peter Write?

Remnant of Ten Tribes on Shores of Black Sea

What Greek Historians Report

Simon Peter in Britain!

And Andrew His Brother

And the Other Apostles?

And Ireland Too!

Paul in Britain, Too?

On the Shores of the Caspian Sea

Where Did Matthew Go?

Chapter XVIII

Since the First Man

Scientific Confusion

Why Hypotheses?

Uncovering the Facts

How Geologists Think

Discarding the Facts

Facts of Geology

Confirmation of Genesis One

The World of Adam

The Sin of Cain and Geology

Early Post-Flood World

Appendix A

The Enigma of Dynasty I and II of Kish Resolved

Appendix B

Ethiopian King List

Agdazyan Dynasty

Dynasty of Menelik I

The Christian Sovereigns

Dynasty of Atse

Sovereigns Issued from Zagwe

A Jewish Dynasty

House of Gondar

Tribe of Ori

Line of Ham

Appendix C

Kashmir -- Chronology from the Rajatarangini

Gonandiya Dynasty

Usurping Dynasty

Restored Gonandiya Dynasty

Karkota Dynasty

The Dynasty of Utpala

First Lohara Dynasty

Second Lohara Dynasty

-------------------

INTRODUCTION

The first volume of the COMPENDIUM OF WORLD HISTORY exposed the

radical new interpretation of history now taught on all levels of

modern education. It revealed the fallacy of the "historical method."

It explained WHY God is left out of history.

Volume I restored the history of ancient Egypt, of Assyria and

Babylonia, of Media and India, of Greece, Ireland and Britain. This

volume completes that restoration. For the first time, in this second

volume, the early history of Europe will be made plain. Its connection

with the New World, with American Indian civilization, with the early

Biblical heroes is an astounding revelation.

CHAPTER I

EARLY HISTORY OF GERMANY

The time has come to reveal the true history of Europe.

The Germans for centuries have dominated the heartland of Western

Europe. Because of the geographic position Germany's transportation

lines constitute the vital arteries of the continent. Without the

beating of the German heart, Europe would lose its economic and

political prominence in world affairs.

Ancient Roman writers would have us believe that the Germans in

the Roman heyday were mere barbarians, an insignificant people roaming

the forests of northern Europe. Was this Roman report the whole truth?

Were the ancient Roman writers keeping back from their people the facts

of German history?

Rome conquered Spain, Gaul, Southern Britain, all North Africa to

the Sahara, Illyria, Greece, Asia to the Euphrates. But Rome had to

draw its boundary in the north along the Rhine. Why? Why was Rome not

able to subdue all Germany? Why, after centuries of bloodshed, did Rome

finally succumb to the hammer blows of the Germanic Goths and Vandals?

It is high time we were told the true history of early Germany.

The origin of the German people in Europe is rooted in patriarchal

times. The history of early Germany, suppressed by the Romans, was

revived briefly in the German-dominated Middle Ages. But before the

close of the seventeenth century not even the Germans remembered their

past. It had been stamped out in the name of education and religion.

But not all was lost. From early documents and local traditions it

is still possible to recover what has, in recent centuries, been buried

under the rubble of modern educational superstition. The Germans

themselves are in great part responsible for this condition. They

fostered modern historical concepts. They have tried to hide their past

even from themselves -- just as they did at the close of the Hitler

era. If the Germans admitted to themselves and the world who they

really are, all the world would recognize in Imperial Germany the

reconstituted Assyrian Empire -- once the terror of all the civilized

world!

ANTIQUITY OF THE GERMAN REICH

Germany has set herself up as the bulwark of European

civilization. Germany for centuries has claimed to stand as the wall of

defense against the barbarism of Asia.

The German Reich long endured as the oldest political institution

in Continental Europe. The German people called their Reich the Holy

Roman Empire. It bore rule over Europe for a thousand years. This "Holy

Roman Empire of the German People" was officially designated by the

Church in the Middle Ages as "The Kingdom of God" on earth. Its

citizens, the Germans, felt themselves true Romans and bearers of the

Christian Reich or kingdom. They were therefore the chosen people of

the Christian era, entrusted with a world-mission to be the protectors

of Christianity.

German leaders and philosophers have never forgotten this notion

of the Middle Ages that the German, in place of the Jew, has a special

mission from God.

This strange concept, which lies behind modern political thinking

in Germany, is plainly stated in the German work "Die Trag"die des

Heiligen Reiches" -- in English, "The Tragedy of the Holy Roman

Empire." It is by Friedrich Heer. It is a remarkable volume. It lays

bare the reason for the secret motives of the German to dominate Europe

-- and the world.

GERMANS SHAPE WORLD AFFAIRS

The story of the ancestry of the German people, and their role in

prophecy, is one of the strangest stories ever written. It is gripping

with interest, amazing -- yes, astounding!

"The History of Germany," writes Bayard Taylor, "is not the

history of a nation, but of a race ... Thus, even before the fall of

the Roman Empire, it becomes the main trunk out of which branch

histories of nearly all European nations, and ... the connecting link

between ancient and modern history. The records of no other race throw

so much light upon the development of all civilized lands during a

period of fifteen hundred years" ("History of Germany", page iii).

Germany has contributed more military leaders than any other

nation in history. Its governments have, in the past, claimed the right

to rule the "Christian world." The German State, from its beginning,

has nearly always been a confederation of states -- often an empire of

German ruling over non-German. It is the German people who, more than

once, have believed themselves to be the "Herrenvolk" -- the Master

Race.

The German people number over one hundred million throughout the

world today. They are composed of numerous small tribes. Nations,

remember, are families grown big. Take Israel as an example. The nation

Israel descended from one man, Jacob (who was renamed Israel upon his

conversion -- Genesis 35:9-10). But Israel had 12 sons. His family

therefore was divided into 12 tribes. One reads in the Bible about "the

12 tribes of Israel" -- Judah, Dan, Ephraim, Levi, etc. (Genesis

49:28).

The same is true of the German people. of all these tribes,

perhaps the most famous name to Americans is that of the Hessians. The

British hired numerous Hessians in their effort to put down the

American Revolution which began in 1776. The Hessians were known to

Roman historians by the tribal name "Hatti." Other Germans bore the

names "Alemani" "Suabi," and "Quadi," the "Casuri." The Romans called

them collectively Germani, meaning "War-men" (from the "Encyclopedia

Britannica", article, "Germany").

But from where did all these Germanic people come?

Here is the answer of history: "There can be no doubt that they

Black and Caspian seas," states "Smith's Classical Dictionary",

article, "Germania," p. 361. Ancient historical records confirm this

admission.

The Germans can be traced in historical records to the regions

surrounding the Black and Caspian seas, which border on the ancient

Biblical Mesopotamia. This is the region where civilization commenced

and from where the patriarchs came!

THE ANSWER FOUND

Ancient German tradition claims that their oldest city, Trier, was

founded by Trever or Trebeta, a son of Ninus, king of Assyria.

"The inhabitants of Trier maintain that their city is the oldest

in all Europe," writes Josef K. L. Bihl in his textbook "In deutschen

Landen", page 69. "Trier was founded," he continues, "by Trebeta, a son

of the famous Assyrian King Ninus. In fact, one finds ... in Trier the

inscription reading, 'Trier existed for 1300 years before Rome was

rebuilt.' "

Ninus, according to Roman, Greek and Persian records, was the

first ruler who began the systematic conquest of the ancient world

after the death of Nimrod. He established the Assyrian Empire as the

chief power over Eastern Europe and Southwest Asia, reported Diodorus

of Sicily in his History.

But how is it possible that the oldest German city, Trier, founded

over 2000 years before the birth of Christ, should be built by a son of

Ninus, the renowned King of ancient Assyria? What connection have the

Germans with Assyria?

Jerome, who lived at the time when the Indo-Germanic tribes were

invading Europe, provides this startling answer: "For 'Assur (the

Assyrian) also is joined with them' " (Letter 123, sec. 16, "Nicene and

Post-Nicene Fathers"; quote is from Psalm 83:8).

DID THE ASSYRIANS INVADE EUROPE?

Yes! Jerome said so! But how did he know?

He saw them! He was an eyewitness to their migrations from

Mesopotamia and the shores of the Black and Caspian seas!

Now consider what Sylax, the author of the "Periplus," who lived

about 550 B.C., writes of the southern shores of the Black Sea: "The

coast of the Black Sea ... is called Assyria" (from page 261 of Perrot

and Chipiez's "History of Art in Sardinia, Judaea, Syria and Asia

Minor", Vol. II.) From there the Assyrians moved north.

Only 300 years before Jerome, the Roman naturalist Pliny the Elder

declared the "Assyriani" -- the Assyrians -- were dwelling north of the

Black Sea ("Natural History", IV, 12, page 183). But the Assyrians did

not remain there. They are not there today. of course not -- they

migrated into Central Europe -- where the Germans live today!

WHAT DID ASSYRIANS LOOK LIKE?

What did the ancient Assyrians look like? Here is the answer: "In

the Zagros hills and across the plain to the Tigris, there lived a ...

fair-haired ... people akin to the Guti (the Goths) who ... remained in

what was afterwards Assyria, the neighbour land to Akkad" (page 5 of

"The Sumerians", by C. Leonard Woolley).

When the ancient Greek writers wanted to distinguish the Assyrians

and their Hebrew captives from the Arameans or Syrians, the Greeks

often called both Assyrians and their Hebrew captives "Leucosyri" --

meaning "whites" or "blonds" as distinct from the very brunette Syrians

who still live in Mesopotamia.

WHY GERMANS CALL THEMSELVES "DEUTSCH"

The Germans do not call themselves "German." They refer to

themselves as Deutschen, and to their country as Deutschland.

When the Assyrians or Germans appeared in Europe, they claimed

Tuitsch as their ancestor! That is where the name "Deutsch" comes from!

"Tuysco, the most ancient and peculiar god of all the Germans ...

of this Tuisco, the first and chiefest man of many among the Germans,

and after whom they do call themselves Tuytshen, that is, duytshes or

duytsh people, I have already spoken." So writes Verstegan in his 1605

publication entitled "Restitution of Decayed Intelligence: in

Antiquities".

Whenever a German calls himself Deutsch, he is therefore saying he

is a descendant of Tuitsch (Tuisco or Tuisto in Latin). And when he

terms his country Deutschland, he is saying his land is Tuitsch's land.

Who this Tuitsch is will be made plain in Chapter II.

WHAT LANGUAGE DID THEY SPEAK

European scholars have thoroughly studied the language of the land

of Hatti -- the ancestors of the Hessians. It is an Indo-Germanic

tongue -- numerous words of which were akin to Old High German. So many

similarities were found that Edgar Sturtevant had to declare: "To me it

seems incredible that so remarkable a situation developed in two

languages independently. I feel compelled to trace the Germanic ... to

a common origin" with the language of Hatti -- common tongue of the

Assyrians in Asia Minor (from "A Comparative Grammar", page 240).

Scholars admit that for centuries the language of the people who

inhabited Assyria was not merely Semitic. Semitic was the late literary

language of Assyria -- the language of scholars, the language of

international commerce. Modern historians and archaeologists assume

that the common tongue of all Assyrian people was Semitic. They have no

proof. So noted an Assyriologist as Sydney Smith admitted "... that the

documents from Asia Minor and from east of Tigris are couched in

Semitic dialects spoken by men unable to pronounce all the Semitic

consonants ..." (p. xi, from "Early History of Assyria to 1000 B.C.").

The same circumstance occurred during the Middle Ages all over

Europe. The language of almost all European scholars -- and even their

names -- until the time of the Protestant Reformation was Latin -- but

Latin was not the common tongue of the people! Because most of the

literature of Germany was in Latin during the Middle Ages does not

prove that the common people spoke Latin.

SEMITIC BY RACE, NOT LANGUAGE

Asshur was a son of Shem. But after the tower of Babel, when the

languages of the world were confused (Genesis 11), most Assyrians no

longer spoke a Semitic tongue, but rather Indo-Germanic and related

tongues! The Germans, therefore, are Semitic by race, but not by

language!

In the days of Abraham, the Germans or Assyrians formed a great

confederation of states or tribes, speaking several different languages

(Josephus' "Antiquities of the Jews", book I, ch. 9). One king of the

Assyrians -- already discussed -- was "Tidal, king of nations" (Genesis

14:1). The name Tidal is Indo-Germanic, not Semitic.

Most scholars have never been conscious of the fact that the use

of the Semitic language in Assyria was due to the rising influence of

the Aramaic people (Genesis 10:22) in Mesopotamia and certain of the

sons of Abraham ("Antiquities", book I, ch. XV, sect. 1). So prominent

did they become that Mesopotamia is called "Padan-Aram" -- the plain of

Aram -- in the Bible (Genesis 28:22).

CHAPTER II

THE ANCIENT KINGS OF THE GERMANS

The settlement of the Assyrians and related peoples in early

Europe is summarized by several writers in the early Middle Ages. The

list of the early kings presented here is from the "Bayerische Chronik"

and "Deutsche Chronik" by Johannes Turmair, Abensberg, 1526.

The traditional events assigned to each ancient German ruler are

confirmed by both archaeological evidence and the fragmentary comments

of classical historians.

The "Bayerische Chronik" is very important for the history of

Central Europe. It proves that German history was correctly preserved

in song and poetry and in contemporary written records down to Roman

times. It further proves that the length of time from the Flood to

Roman times was accurately preserved except for an overlooked 24 years.

This period was the 24 years from Abram's year 75 to his year 99. The

later chroniclers, who placed in parallel German and Hebrew history,

universally reckoned the 430 years from the Covenant that was confirmed

with Abraham to Sinai as beginning when Abram was 75 years old, instead

of 99. They therefore placed the Flood 24 years too late in history.

The German chronicles that were the basis of Turmair's work placed

the Flood 131 years before the coming of the German patriarch Tuisto

into Europe. They should have reckoned 131 plus 24 -- that is, 155

years. With this one exception, all dates from Tuisto down to the

burning of Rome in 390 B.C. need no correction. All that is necessary

is to add the separate lengths of reign. There are no missing lengths

of reign.

German history commences with an extensive settlement of farmers

in Europe from the Don River to the Rhine. The date of this migration

into Europe from Mesopotamia and the Near East is placed at 2214 B.C.

by German history -- just 155 years after the Flood and 40 years after

the Tower of Babel.

BEGINNING OF GERMAN OR ASSYRIAN HISTORY

The real beginnings of Assyrian history were not presented in

Volume I. They are restored here. One account begins with the reign of

Nimrod in 2194 -- after the 60-year reign of Cush. Cush was the first

Belus -- the word means "lord" -- who bore rule after the Flood.

Early Rulers of Assyria

and Babylon Lengths of Reign Dates

Saturn: the Nimrod of Scripture, 56 2194-2138

known also as Ninus I.

Belus: great lord of Assyria 55 2138-2083

-- a title of Shem as lord

over all his family. The

title was later taken by Asshur.

Ninus II: conquered the 52 2100-2048

Middle East in 17 years

(2100-2083), while his

father was recognized as

supreme ruler, (see

Diodorus Siculus).

Ninus is the name of

Asshur used by classical

writers.

Semiramis or Ishtar 42 2048-2006

Ninyas: called Zames 38 2006-1968

(see Vol. 1 for history).

THE EARLY SETTLERS OF EUROPE

The "Bavarian Chronicle" records in detail the earliest settlers

of Europe after the Deluge. Their encampments and habitations have been

recovered by archaeological research and are labeled the "Neolithic"

migrations that traversed the Danube and adjoining valleys.

Shem or Tuitsch came into Europe with members of his family, as

well as with certain of the sons of Japheth and two of the sons of Ham

who were of the white stock. From these have descended most of the

present-day nations of Europe. The descendants of Shem include many

sons of Joktan, son of Heber, and a number of the sons of Mash, son of

Aram. The Biblical names (Genesis 10) of the grandsons and

great-grandsons of Shem are clearly preserved in most instances by the

"Chronicle". In the following chart, together with the names of the

patriarchal settlers, appear either the areas settled, the tribes which

sprang from them, or their Biblical names. An historical or classical

map should be consulted for location of geographic names. In later

times the descendants of these early heroes migrated west, south, north

and east under population pressure.

Dukes settled by Shem

in Europe Identity, or Area settled

1. Sarmata, son of settled Sarmatia; is the

Joktan Hazarmaveth of Gen. 10:26;

colonized south Arabia;

a son Tanaus gave his name

to the river Tanais, now

called the Don.

2. Dacus, son of Mash, settled Dacia, later also

grandson of Aram colonized in Denmark

3. Geta, another son from whom came certain of

of Mash (included in the Getae of Roman history

Anderson's "Royal

Genealogies", but

not in "Bavarian

Chronicle")

4. Gotha Gether from whom came the Goths

(v .23)

5. Tibiscus, late settled on the river

Latin spelling of Theiss or Tibiscus;

Tiobo, an Italian descendants migrated into

spelling of Jobab Germany (see "Encyclopedia

(Gen. 10:29) Britannica", article

"Archaeology")

6. Moesa, Mash settled Mysia and Moesia

(Gen. 10:23)

7. Phrygus, or Brigus, settled in Phrygia and

son of Mash (Gen. Europe

10:23)

8. Thynus, son of Mash settled Bithynia in Asia

Minor

9. Dalmata, Almodad settled Dalmatia on Adriatic

(v. 26)

10. Jader, Jerah (v .26), founded the port called

his descendants also Jaderia Colonia in Illyria

settled in Arabia

11. Albanus or Albion, for whom Albania is named,

Abimael (v. 28) and also Albion or Britain;

his descendants early

migrated to the Isle of

Britain

12. Sabus or Sau, Sheba settled on the river Save;

(v. 28) migrated to Italy as

Sabines

13. Pannus or Benno, settled Pannonia

son of Mash

14. Sala or Salon built the town Sala; gave

Shelah (v. 24) his name to river Sal

15. Azalus or Aezel, ancestor of the Azali;

Uzal (v. 27) also settled in Aezeland

in Pannonia

16. Hister, the Joktan settled Istria; Hister

of the Bible (Gen. means same in Indo-European

10:25) tongues that Joktan does

in Hebrew -- water course

(Rawlinson, "Ancient

History")

17. Adulas or Adler, anciently dwelt on Upper

Hadoram (v. 27); Rhine; his son Than gave

colonized in Arabia his name to the river

Thonau, now called the

Danube

18. Dicla, Diklah thought to have dwelt on

(v. 27) Upper Rhine; his

descendants later migrated

to Gedrosia in Persia

l9. Obalus or Elb, from him the river Elbe

Obal (v. 28) takes its name

20. Epirus Ophir colonized Asia from Epirus

(v. 29)

21. Eber built Ebersau -- the

Eburodunum of Ptolemy's

map

22. Hoeril, Havilah gave his name to river

(Gen. 10:29) Havel or Havila (Jacobus

Schatz: "Atlas Homannianus

Illustratus", p. 121); from

him descended the Heruli

The white descendants of the following patriarchs also colonized

parts of Europe:

23. Arcadius, father of the settled Arcadia in Greece

Arkites (Gen. 10:17)

24. Emathius, father of settled Emathia in Macedonia

Hamathites (Gen. 10:18)

25. Tiras, son of colonized Thrace

Japheth

26. Moska, Meshech -- colonized east of the

son of Japheth Carpathians

27. Javan, son of Hebrew name for Greece is

Japheth Javan

28. Thubal, son of Josephus records that

Japheth certain of his children

settled Spain

29. Gomer, son of dwelt for a time in Italy

Japheth

30. Asch, Ashkenaz -- his descencants mixed with

son of Gomer the Goths -- whence Jews

who settled in Central

Europe acquired name of

Ashkenazim

31. Reif or Rus, settled in Scythia and

Riphath -- son of White Russia

Gomer

32. Tagus, Togarmah -- dwelt for a time in Southern

son of Gomer Europe

KINGS OF ANCIENT GERMANY

Early Kings of German Lengths of Reign Dates

1. Tuitsch or Tuisto 176 2214-2038

(236) (2214-1978)

Chief of thirty-two dukes. Noah gave him all the land between the

Don River and the Rhine or what was called Grossgermania. This is the

beginning of the "neolithic" settlement of Europe. Tuitsch is,

according to all ancient German commentaries and chronicles, a son of

Noah. But which son? Noah adopted Tuitsch's children as his own. The

ancient Germans understood the name Tuitsch to be the title "Teacher."

He was therefore the great patriarch of his family who taught the

divine will to his children.

Tuitsch is the father of Mannus (who is the Assyrian Ninus). The

son of Mannus, Trebeta, is the same man who is called the son of Ninus

in classical writers. The son of Mannus or Ninus -- Trebeta -- built

Trier, the first town of Germany. Since the Bible calls this Ninus (who

built Nineveh), Asshur, Tuitsch is therefore Shem!

Tuitsch (Shem) left Europe for Egypt in 2038. His appearance in

Egyptian chronological records of Dynasty I dates his arrival and

government in 2037. From Armenia Tuitsch left 155 years after the Flood

(131 plus 24) -- see the comments at the beginning of this chapter.

With him were twenty-two descendants plus eight from Japheth and two

from Ham. Tuitsch made his headquarters at Deutz (today Koeln-Deutz).

The country is called Deutschland after him -- that is, the land of the

great Patriarch or Teacher, Shem. In the 25th year of his reign

(2190-2189) Tuitsch held a state assembly, divided lands among his

descendants and ordained laws. He also brought more colonies from

Mesopotamia.

2. Mannus or Mann 72 1978-1906

(66) (1978-1912)

For the last 60 years of Tuitsch's or Shem's reign in Germany, he

governed his family from Egypt and Italy. It was not until 1978 that

Mannus assumed the government over Western Europe, succeeding his

father Tuitsch. At the beginning of his reign he sends out colonies to

France and Asia Minor. His son Herman establishes the kingdoms of

Phrygia, Mysia and Bithynia in Mannus' 34th year (1945-1944). Another

son Trieber or Trebeta, built Trier. Nerus, another son, settled in the

Netherlands. This Mannus is the Assyrian Ninus and is Asshur, son of

Shem. Asshur means "strength" in Hebrew and has the same sense as

Mannus -- masculinity -- in German.

3. Eingeb or Ingaevon 36 1906-1870

(40) (1912-1872)

This son of Mannus or Ninus -- Asshur -- was the German Mercury.

His wife Freia was the German Venus. He instituted the observance of

Weinnachten of December 24. Eingeb is responsible for settling Germans

on the North Sea from Denmark to Dunkirk. He sent his general Brigus

from the Danube valley to secure Spain against the African Amazons

(female warriors). Myrein, queen of the African Amazons advanced up the

Danube but was defeated and slain by Eingeb's generals Seiphyl and

Mopser.

4. Ausstaeb or Istaevon 50 1870-1820

(52) (1872-1820)

Son of Eingeb, Ausstaeb was the German Mars. From him are

descended the Rheinlanders. In his days a great drought devastated

Italy.

5. Herman 63 1820-1757

Son of Ausstaeb. He taught the philosophy that war and to die in

battle is most pleasing to God. He introduced the arts of warmaking to

the Germans. The Druids began to flourish in Germany. Herman settled

the heart of Germany, whose people were called Hermanduri or Hermiones

after him.

6. Mers 46 1757-1711

Son of Herman. The city of Merseburg is named after him. The

Dithmarsii descended from him. Oryz, the Egyptian god-king Osiris, came

with his wife Eisen up the Danube valley to Mers. They left Germany and

went to Italy on their way back to Egypt. Cultural development of

Germany through contact with Egypt in days of Joseph -- beer making,

agriculture, forging and medicine were brought to Germany.

7. Gampar 44 1711-1667

Son of Mers. He was the inventor of beer brewing. His daughter

Araxa became one of the wives of Libys (the Egyptian and Spanish

Hercules), the son of Oryz, and gave birth to Tuscus, Schyth,

Agatyrsus, Peucinger and Gutho.

8. Schwab 46 1667-1621

Son of Gampar. He gave his name to Schwaben. In his reign Eisen

came to Germany and taught the people various crafts.

9. Wandler 41 1621-1580

Son of Schwab. Ancestor of the German Wenden or Vandals, who were

first known at the Weser, next in the countries north of the Elbe;

afterwards, a colony went into Spain, then into Africa where they

restored the Roman Empire; their kingdom was demolished by General

Belisarius. The cities of Luebeck, Rostoch, Dantzig, and others are the

relics of those first Vandals who did not migrate to North Africa.

These German Vandals are different from the Wends called Slavi,

Slavonians, Poles, Bohemians who settled in the ancient lands of the

Vandals.

10. Deuto 27 1580-1553

Son of Wandler, gave his name to the Teutones. He led a campaign

into France and built there the cities of Vannes, Sens, Santgenge and

Toulouse. He was deified as the German Mercury, as Eingeb had

previously been.

11. Alman (Allmann or Altman) 64 1553-1489

Son of Deuto, was the German Hercules. Famous for use of trained

lions in war. Bore a lion in his shield. Bavarians, who descended from

him, still use a lion on their coat of arms. He had many sons. Norein

received Noricum (in Bavaria today). Norein was the father of part of

the Bavarians. Haun was the father of the German Huns and lived with

his brothers Glan and Schyter. Helvos was the father of the Helvetti in

Switzerland. Baier ruled Bavaria. Mied and Math were the ancestors of

the Mediomatrices in Alsace. Theur went to foreign lands.

12. Baier 60 1489-1429

Son of Alman. He sent a great army of Germans and Wends from

Germany, Denmark and Gothland to the Balkans. One group, the Goths

under Gebreich and Vilmer, settled on the river Theissa and lived there

as the Getae till the time of Valentinian. Another group, including the

German Amazons, proceeded down the Danube valley to the Black Sea and

on through the Crimea and the Palus Maeotis to Armenia and Cappadocia

and the Taurus mountains. Here they were known as the Cimmerians. Baier

was also known as Bojus of Bavaria since he was the ancestor of many

Bavari. He built Prague.

13. Ingram or Ingramus 52 1429-1377

Son of Baier. He sent many German colonists to Asia Minor.

Tanhauser, king of the Germans in Asia Minor, and his priestess

Schmirein, led a conquering army through Syria as far as Egypt. Built

Hermenia, afterwards called Reginoberg (Ratisbon).

14. Adalger or Adelger 49 1377-1328

Son of Ingram. German Amazons were again famous in his time under

Queens Lautpotis and Martpeis. They crossed through Asia Minor to

Lycia, but were defeated.

15. Larein 51 1328-1277

Son of Adalger. This is the Laertes of Trojan fame, mentioned by

the Roman historian Tacitus. During his rule an army set out from

Germany and went via Poland and Ruthenia to the Danube valley. Here it

was joined by Germans who had come to the area some 150 years earlier,

and the combined forces fell into Asia Minor under their leader Mader

and their queen Aloph. They passed through Phrygia and settled in

Armenia.

16. Ylsing or Ulsing 53 1277-1224

Son of Larein. This is the Trojan Ulysses of Tacitus. He is also

the Greek Odysseus who sailed out to the Atlantic and up to the Rhine.

Built Emmerick on the Main. During his reign the Germans under Galter

again invaded Asia Minor and settled on the banks of the river

Sangarius. Priam of Troy tried in vain to expel them, finally made a

treaty, and they later helped him against the Greeks.

17. Brenner or Breno 38 1224-1186

Son of Ylsing, in whose reign Prichs ruled the Germans on the

Black Sea and the women under queen Themyschyr conquered Bithynia,

Paphlagonia and Cappadocia.

18. Heccar (Hykar or Highter) 31 1186-1155

Son of Brenner. He is the famous Hector of the First Trojan War.

He was of great help to Priam. Teutschram, king of the Germans of

Transylvania and son-in-law of Priam also sent help.

19. Frank (Francus or Franco) 41 1155-1114

Son of Heccar. From him descended the German Franks or

Franconians. In his days Amar, queen of the German Amazons, burned the

temple in Ephesus.

20. Wolfheim Siclinger 58 1114-1056

Son of Frank. He sent another great migration of settlers from

Germany to the Black Sea.

21. Kels, Gal and Hillyr 50 1056-1006

Sons of Wolfheim. They divided their father's realm after his

death. Hillyr received Illyria, Gal received Gaul and Kels received

Germany. Hillyr had three daughters and six sons, all of whom settled

in the regions of the Balkans, Thrace and Greece.

22. Alber 60 1006-946

Son of Gal, ruled together with his six cousins. The center of his

government was in France.

23. Walther, Panno and Schard 62 946-884

Another son of Gal, ruled together with Panno and Schard, the

grandsons of Hillyr. From Walther Italy is called Walhen or Walschland.

Panno gave his name to Pannonia. From Schard came the Schardinger or

Schordisci.

24. Main, Žngel and Treibl 70 884-814

Sons of Walther, ruled jointly with Treibl, son of Panno. From

Žngel are descended the Angles who lived in Th�ringen and Meissen.

25. Myela, Laber and Penno 100 814-714

They ruled jointly.

26. Venno and Helto 70 714-644

Ruled jointly. Helto invaded and settled in Italy, expelling the

former inhabitants.

27. Mader (Madyas) 55 644-589

Made extensive conquests. He built Milan. He led a German campaign

as far as Syria and Palestine. Of his sons, Balweis received Lombardy,

Sigweis Bavaria, and Brenner Th�ringen and Meissen.

28. Brenner II and Koenman 110 589-479

Brenner was the son of Mader. He was an "Engl"nder" and king of

the Schwaben. His wife was Th"m"rin (Tomyris), queen of the Getae,

Dacians and Scythians. Brenner sent her troops to help in the war

against Cyrus. He also defeated Darius who tried to invade the lower

Danube region. Together Brenner and Th"m"rin conquered much of Asia

Minor as far as Armenia. His nephew K"nman, son of Sigweis, was king of

the Bavarians. Brenner expelled K"nman and 300,000 Bavarians from

Bohemia and resettled that region with Schwaben, who then became known

as Markmannen. Some of the expelled Bavarians settled in Bavaria

proper, but by far the largest number of them crossed the Alps into

Italy, from where they drove out some of the Etruscans. After the death

of K"nman, the Bavarians of Italy were ruled by the kings Zeck, Ber

(who built Bern or Verona) and Breitmar.

29. Landein with his sons 80 479-399

Ant"r and R"g"r

30. Brenner III 38 399-361

Son of Breitmar, was king over both Schwaben and Bavarians, and

reigned over Germany and Italy. Under his leadership the Schwaben and

Bavarians sacked Rome. He had sons H"rkaz, Matsch"r, Guotfrid and

Schirm. His daughter Gueta was married to Philip of Macedon. Burning of

Rome (July 390) occurred in his 9th year.

31. Schirm 361-263

Son of Brenner III. He and his son Brenner IV ruled until 60 years

after death of Alexander -- although Brenner IV dies earlier. Brenner

led a massive German invasion into Greece, plundered Macedonia and the

oracle at Delphi, but was killed in 279 B.C.

32. Thessel 85 279-194

Son of Brenner IV, ruled jointly with his uncle Lauther and his

brother Euring. Lauther, with his brother Lebmner, broke into Asia

Minor with 20,000 men and settled in Cappadocia and Phrygia. Thessel's

sons Breitmar, Ernvest and Wirdm"r ruled over the Bavarians in Italy.

His wife, Teutscha, was queen of Istria. The Romans defeated the

Bavarians in Italy, killing Wirdm"r and 40,000 of his men.

33. Dieth I no length given 194-172

Son of Thessel, ruled jointly with his son Diethmer. Diethmer

invaded Palestine on behalf of Antiochus IV, took many Jews captive and

settled them in Germany near Regensburg. Soon afterwards Hannibal

attacked Italy and many of the Bavarians from Northern Italy joined him

against Rome. After Hannibal's defeat there followed a war between the

Romans and Bavarians in northern Italy which lasted 12 years. Finally,

weary of fighting, the Bavarians left Italy, where they had dwelt for

almost 400 years, and settled in Pannonia. Dieth was also driven from

Italy, whereupon Diethmer, in retaliation, persuaded Philip V of

Macedon to renew his hostilities with Rome. Entz and Olor, German kings

in Istria and Transylvania, aided Philip, but Rome won. In Asia Minor

Rome launched an attack against the German kings Orthjag, Gompelmer,

G"udhor, Orgsgund and Eposgnad. These retreated eastward over the

Halys, where they were defeated, sued for peace, and swore never to

raid foreign nations again. The Romans also defeated king Entz of

Istria.

34. Baermund and Synpol 45 172-127

Ruled after the death of Dieth I and Diethmer.

35. Boiger, Kels and 27 127-100

Teutenbuecher

They ruled jointly over the Germans and Bavarians in 127 B.C. They

gathered an army of 300,000 Saxons and Bavarians, intending to invade

and resettle Italy, from which they had been driven some 70 years

earlier. They were, however, defeated by Marius at Aquae Sextiae (102

B.C.) and Vercellae (101 B.C.). Boiger died, having reigned 27 years.

36. Scheirer 30 100-70

Mithridates tried to enlist his aid in the struggles against Rome.

37. Ernst (Arionistus) and Vocho 20 70-50

Ernst was king over Germany and France, his brother-in-law, Vocho,

over Bavaria, Austria and Hungary. Ernst invaded France, fought there

for 14 years, and settled it with 120,000 Germans. Next 33,000

Bavarians decided to go via France and Spain into Italy. They were

joined by the Helvetti. Julius Caesar defeated them, sent the Helvetii

back home, but allowed the Bavarians to settle in Burgundy. Caesar also

defeated king Ernst.

38. Pernpeist 10 50-40

He made a treaty with Persia against the Romans, made raids into

Greece and even attacked Apulia and Naples by sea. The Bavarians,

having been driven from Italy, lived near the Drave and Danube for 127

years. In the times of Ernst and Pernpeist they left their homes,

sailed down the Danube and settled near the Vistula, Dniester and

Dnieper, where they remained some 550 years. The name of the Bavarians

is not encountered again for some 500 years, till the time of Attila.

39. Cotz, Dieth II and circa 40-13

Creitschir

In 13 B.C. Augustus made an attack against the Germans on the

Danube. Later he settled 40,000 Westphalians, Hessians and Schwaben on

the west bank of the Rhine.

Virtual anarchy now began to reign among the German tribes. There

were anti-Roman and pro-Roman factions and these split whole tribes and

even families. The ruling families soon killed each other off in family

feuds and inter-tribal warfare.

The royal house that next dominated Germany came from the

Sicambrian Franks. Their history appears later in the "Compendium",

chapter XII A.

CHAPTER III

ABRAHAM IN EARLY EUROPEAN HISTORY

For centuries students have been taught that Europe was one of

late areas of the world to become civilized. Educational tradition

would have us believe that Egyptians were erecting mighty temples of

stone, had wide astronomical knowledge, knew how to write, thousands of

years before Western Europe came to the threshold of civilization.

While Egyptians and Babylonians were arrayed in gorgeous robes and

painted with cosmetics, historians would have Europe's forests sparcely

populated with naked white savages. Europe's dominant place in world

affairs is, we are told, a relatively new phenomenon.

Nothing could be further from the truth!

EUROPE'S EARLY HISTORY SUPPRESSED

European civilization -- and its history -- is as old as Egypt's.

But it has been suppressed. Not since the close of the seventeenth

century has it been allowed to be taught publicly.

It did not happen in a day. It took centuries of calculated

plotting and ridicule to wipe from the pages of history the record of

early Europe. Historians and theologians have conspired together to

label Europe's early history as "myth."

Their motive is plain. If theologians and historians had allowed

the early history of Europe to be taught in schools and universities,

they would have had to admit the authenticity and the authority of the

Bible. THAT they did not want to do.

Had they not expunged the early events of Europe every one today

would be reading of the journeys of Noah, Shem, Heber, Asshur and many

other Biblical heroes into Europe. Children would be reading in schools

today of the early settlement of Assyrians and Chaldeans in Western

Europe. They would know where the "Ten Lost Tribes" of the House of

Israel migrated.

All this has been purposely hidden. But it has not all been lost.

Scattered through the writings of scholars of the fifteenth, sixteenth

and seventeenth centuries are fragmentary records which unveil what

really happened in Europe. In museums and libraries, in state archives

are still to be found documents of hoary antiquity corroborating the

Biblical record.

This chapter contains the account of one of those documents. It is

a history of the Danubian Valley -- the area of Austria, Hungary,

Bohemia, Bavaria and neighboring regions. The document is the

"Oesterreichische Chronik" -- the Austrian Chronicle. It has never

before been rendered into modern English. A number of copies of the

Chronicle are scattered throughout Europe. The last entry in the

Chronicle is of the year 1404.

ABRAHAM IN THE AUSTRIAN CHRONICLE

The Austrian Chronicle begins its consecutive history with a man

of princely birth -- none other than the patriarch Abraham! But what

has Abraham to do with the history of the Danubian Valley in Europe?

Very much.

The most ancient Greek name for the Danube River was the River

Noe. Noe is the Greek form of the Hebrew Noah.

Noah was the patriarch of the whole human family following the

flood. His patriarchal authority passed on to Shem, who superseded his

older brother Japheth. In each succeeding generation the hereditary

right of the firstborn was passed on from father to son. Terah was

eighth in descent from Shem (Genesis 11:10-26), and the heir to Noah

and Shem. Terah had, according to the Biblical record, three sons. The

oldest, Haran, was born when Terah was 70 years old (Gen. 11:26). He

died before his father Terah did (Gen 11:28). "And Haran died in the

presence of his father Terah in the land of his nativity, in Ur of the

Chaldees." Why Haran died young will be made plain shortly from the

Austrian Chronicle.

Replacing Haran as heir was Terah's second son, Abram (whose name

was later changed to Abraham).

In the year 1941 God called Abraham to forsake his kindred, his

country -- everything. "Now the Lord said unto Abram: 'Get thee out of

thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto

the land that I will show thee. And I will bless thee, and make thy

name great ...'" (Gen. 12:1-2).

Abram had to give up his hereditary privileges. Though he was a

"mighty prince" (Gen. 23:6), he willingly forsook his inherited rights.

"So Abram went, "declares verse 4.

Now consider the Austrian Chronicle. It begins with the birth of

Abram (he is called Abraham throughout the Chronicle) under the

Assyrian Count Sattan of Aligem (sect 41). (Several of the earliest

geographic names in the Chronicle are otherwise unknown from

contemporary records.) Abram "took to wife Susanna from the land of

Samam, the daughter of Terromant and his wife Sanyet."

Of this union we read in Scripture: "And Abraham gave all that he

had unto Isaac. But unto the sons of the concubines, that Abraham had,

Abraham gave gifts, and he sent them away from Isaac his son, while he

yet lived, eastward, unto the east country" -- Assyria (Gen. 25:5-6).

From the Austrian Chronicle we learn that "Abraham and Susanna had

a son Achaim." Then "Abraham of Temonaria and Count Sattan of

Aligemorum had war with each other, till Abraham was driven from the

land in poverty." It was in this war that Haran, Abram's older brother,

was slain. Abram was driven out of Count Sattan's realm and fled to the

Danube River Valley in 1945, according to the Chronicle. There he built

a home and settled until the death of Count Sattan.

It was now 1942 -- three years after Abram fled. Abram, according

to the Chronicle, took Achaim and Susanna and went to the land of

Judeisapta -- "the Jews' land" -- Palestine, according to the Bible.

(The later scribes who copied the Austrian Chronicle assumed it was the

Danube Valley because Jews were later settled there also.) From

Palestine Abraham sent away eastward to Assyria Susanna and Achaim (in

Isaac's second year). From there they journeyed to the Danubian

settlement Abram made years before. The previous chapter revealed that

the Danubian Valley was then under Assyrian hegemony.

The following sequence of landgraves and dukes is taken from the

standard text of the "Oesterreichische Chronik" -- the Austrian

Chronicle. Variations in spelling are at times included. The lengths of

reign and dates are in every case those of the Chronicle, which

correctly preserves the chronology beginning three years before the

call of Abram.

Rulers Lengths of Reign Dates

Abraham 30 1945-1915

Susanna, Abraham's 19 1915-1896

concubine, departs

Palestine for Assyria, and

then the Danubian Valley.

Achaim, Abraham and 45 1896-1851

Susanna's son, married a

Hungarian countess named

Nannaym. They had four

children; one daughter,

Volim; another, Rawlint; a

son, Laptan; and a third

daughter, Remmanna.

Raban -- Volim's husband, 45 1851-1806

a baron from Bohemia; they

have one son, Laptan. He

changed the name of his

duchy from Arratim to

Sawricz.

Laptan -- Raban and 3 1806-1803

Volim's son, dies without

wife and heir.

Laptan, Achaim's son, 49 1803-1754

marries a countess from

Bohemia by name of Rama.

They added Steiermark to

their hereditary land.

Had two sons, Rimer and

Nynter.

Rymer, died without wife (6 months) (1754)

and heir.

Nymer (Nynter), made the 52 1754-1702

margraviate to a dukedom,

called himself "Nynter, a

Heathen, duke of Sawricz."

Married a duchess called

Sinna. Only son is Lynal.

Lynal, called the land 32 1702-1670

Sannas, after his wife;

married a countess from

Hungary called Synna. They

had three children: a son,

Rantan; a daughter, Lengna;

and another son, Poyna.

Rantan, died without wife (3 months) (1670)

and heir.

Poyna (Peynna, Pyna), 51 1670-1619

Lynal's youngest son,

married a duchess from

Bohemia, named Sanna. They

had four children: a daughter,

Sinna, and three sons, Pynan,

Lippan, and Rimman.

Pynan, died without wife and 1 1619-1618

neir.

Lippan, died without wife (14 days) (1618)

and heir.

Rymman, died without wife (6 months) (1618)

and heir.

Zawan (Zaban, Sawan), 61 1618-1557

Synna's husband, a Hungarian

duke. They have one son

Rattan.

Rattan (Nattan) marries a 67 1557-1490

duchess from Bohemia,

named Sanna. They had

two sons, Reymar and Noro.

Reymar (Rymmar) died (1 1/2 months) (1490)

without wife and heir.

Noro (Nero), marries a 43 1490-1447

wife from Carinthia,

named Lenna; they had

two children, a daughter,

Sanna; and a son, Aucz.

Aucz, changed the name 57 1447-1390

of the land from Sannas

to Pannaus, called him

self "Aucz, a Heathen."

Married Lenna, a duchess

from Bohemia. They had

one son, Nonas.

Nonas, marries Lenna, a 57 1390-1333

duchess from Lanazz. They

had a daughter, Sinna.

Tanton (Tonton), count 40 1333-1293

from Panticz, marries Sinna;

they had two sons, Tatan

and Remar. Remar died

before his father.

Tatan (Taton), marries 61 1293-1232

duchess from Bohemia,

named Synnan (Synna);

both later buried at the

Danube near Vienna. They

had two daughters, Sanna

and Lany (Lanus). Older

daughter died a year after

father.

Mantan (Manthan, Mathan), 49 1232-1183

a duke from Bohemia,

marries Lany. They had a`

son, Manan.

Manan, marries Hungarian 59 1183-1124

countess, Lenna. They had

a son Nanaym, and a daughter

Senna. Senna died before her

father.

Nanaim (Nananaym, Nanaym) 38 1124-1086

marries Menna (Manna), a

Hungarian duchess. They

had two daughters, Lenna and

Zema (Sema), and a son Ramaim.

Lenna died unmarried. Ramaim

(Ramaym) died a year after

his father.

Mangais (Mangaizz, Mangrizz, 46 1086-1040

Magais), a duke from Hungary,

marries Zema. He changes

the name of the land from

Pannauz (Pannawz) to Tantamo

(Tantamus). He calls himself

"Mangais, a Heathen." They

had one son Manan.

Manan, marries a 55 1040-985

Bohemian duchess named

Sinna (Suma, Sanna, Samia).

They had one daughter,

Semna (Senna).

Laptan, a Hungarian duke 67 985-918

marries Semna. They had

one son, Lanan.

Lanan, married Sanna (Senna), 51 918-867

a duchess from Bohemia. They

had two daughters, Sanna

and Senna, and a son, Maran.

Senna died before her father.

Maran, died without wife and (6 months) (867)

heir

Manay, a duke from Bohemia, 54 867-813

marries Sanna. They had a

son, Tantan (Tanton), and

a daughter, Lemna (Lenna).

Lemna died unmarried.

Tantan, married Hungarian 57 813-756

duchess named Malan (Malon).

They had two sons, Zanan

(Sanan, Janan) and Peyman,

and a daughter, Peynin (Peyn,

Peymin).

Zanan, died without wife (3 months) (756)

and heir.

Peyman, married Hungarian 48 756-708

duchess named Lanna. They

had three sons, Nanman

(spelled also Nannan,

Mannan, and Nanan), Gennan

and Saptan.

After the death of Peyman and Lanna, who had both been heathen,

the "Oesterreichische Chronik" records that the whole country accepted

the Jewish faith! The next chapter reveals how and why it happened!

CHAPTER IV

JEWS GAIN POWER IN DANUBE CIVILIZATION

How did this unique influence of the Jews in Eastern Europe begin?

Scholars and historians -- many of them Jews -- have puzzled over

the presence of the huge Jewish population in Eastern Europe. There is

no recorded evidence that they migrated from Babylon after the

Babylonian captivity. Nor are they the descendants from the destruction

of Jerusalem by Titus in A.D. 70.

Who, then, brought the Jews into Eastern Europe seven centuries

before the birth of Jesus.

The answer has been in the Bible all these years! It is found in

II Kings 18:13-16. "Now in the fourteenth year of king Hezekiah did

Sennacherib king of Assyria come up against all the fortified cities of

Judah, and took them. And Hezekiah king of Judah sent to the king of

Assyria to Lachish, saying: 'I have offended; return from me; that

which thou puttest on me will I bear.' And the king of Assyria

appointed unto Hezekiah king of Judah three hundred talents of silver

and thirty talents of gold. And Hezekiah gave him all the silver that

was found in the house of the Lord, and in the treasures of the king's

house. At that time did Hezekiah cut off the gold from the doors of the

temple of the Lord, and from the door-posts which Hezekiah king of

Judah had overlaid, and gave it to the king of Assyria." A parallel

account may be read in either II Chronicles 32 or Isaiah 36.

Notice the dates of this event -- the fourteenth year of Hezekiah

-- 711-710. Sennacherib was at this time associated with his father on

the throne of Assyria. A vigorous general, he captured all the

fortified cities of Judah except Jerusalem, enslaved the inhabitants.

Where he carried them had been unknown to historians. But the answer is

preserved for us in the "Austrian Chronicle". He carried them into

Eastern Europe along the Danube River. But how could an Assyrian king

of Nineveh plant tens of thousands of Jewish captives in Europe? --

because Central Europe was then part of the Assyrian Empire.

JEWISH KINGS FROM AUSTRIAN CHRONICLE

Rulers Lengths of Reign Dates

Gennan, middle son of Peyman, 4 708-704

became duke. He was overcome,

records the Austrian Chronicle,

by the Jews and was circumcised,

accepted Jewish marriage

customs, put away images and

acknowledged the Hebrew

faith. He called himself "Gennan,

a Jew." There were not yet any

Jewish noble, willing to give

their daughters in marriage to

him. So he died without wife

and heir.

Nanman and Saptan, sons of 61 704-643

Peyman, split the country.

Nanman chose the lower and

Septan the upper part.

Nanman married a Hungarian

duchess called Meynin (Mennin).

Saptan became the Master over

his brother and over all the

land, also changed its name to

Mittanauz. He married a

Bohemian duchess called Salaim

(Salan, Salann, Salim), who

was a Jewess. They had two

sons, Tanton and Rippan.

Tanton died without wife before

his father.

Rippan, a Jew, married a 57 643-586

countess from Penenaw (Pennawe),

named Menna. They had one son,

Lantawz, and two daughters,

Pamyn and Rachaym. Lantawz and

Pamyn (Panym) died unmarried

before their father.

Salant, a Jew, a duke from 45 586-541

Hungary, married Rachaim.

They had one son, Piltan II

(Pilton, Pilkan) who died.

After both this son and

Salant had died, Rachaim

remarried.

Laptan, a Jew from Bohemia, 15 541-526

married Rachaim. Changed

the name of the land from

Mittanauz (Mittenaus) to

Fannau (Fannawe). They

died without an heir.

At that time there ruled 40 526-486

a Jewish duke in Hungary,

called Almantan. He

usurped the power and

conquered the dukedom of

Fannaw. Almantan brought

with him his wife, a

Bohemian duchess, named

Schlammyn (Schalmmyn). She

was Jewish. They had two

sons, Rantanaiz and Halman

(Halbman). Halman became

duke of Hungary.

Rantanaiz (Rattans), in 57 486-429

his day the name of the

land was changed from

Fannaw to Aurata. He

called himself "Rattanaiz,

a Jew." Married Bohemian

duchess called Sawlin

(Sawlim). They had a son

who died without name, and

a daughter, Lenna.

Rettan, Hungarian duke, 45 429-384

marries Lenna. He changed

the name of the land from

Aurata to Fyla. They had

a son, Manton (Montan).

Flanton, married Sanna, 54 384-330

a duchess from Bavaria.

They had a son, Hegan and

a daughter, Semyn. Hegan

died unmarried before his

father.

Rattan, a Hungarian duke, 39 330-291

marries Semyn. They had

one son, Attalon.

Attalon, married a Bohemian 57 291-234

duchess, Magalim. They had

three sons, Raban, Penyn

and Effra, and Semna, a

daughter. Semna died young.

Penyn also died without

wife and heir.

Raban (Rawan, Raban), (6 months) (234)

married a Bohemian duchess

called Sancta (Santta,

Santla). They died without

Elelr.

Effra, Attalon's youngest 49 234-185

son, married Hungarian

duchess, Samaym, who was

Jewish. They had one son, Naban.

Naban, married a Hungarian 52 185-133

duchess, a Jewess, Samanna.

They had a son, Rolan, and

a daughter, Signa who died

unmarried.

Rolan (Nolan), changed the 32 133-101

name of the land from Fyla

to Rarasma. Married a

Hungarian duchess, Sanna.

They had two daughters,

Eminna and Sanna. Eminna

died unmarried.

Remar (Reinar, Reimar), 53 101- 48

a Bohemian duke, married

Sanna. They had one son,

Natan.

Natan, married Hungarian 41 48- 7

duchess, Satym (Satyn).

They had two daughters,

Masym and Rachym.

Masym, a duchess. She 2 1/2 7- 5

died before marrying. Her

sister Rachym obtained the

duchy.

Raban (Naban), a Bohemian 51 5 B.C. to 47 A.D.

duke, married Rachim. They

had two sons, Lanat (Lenat,

Lamer, Laniar), and Sannet

(Samet, Samer). Lanat died

young.

Sannet, married a Hungarian 34 47- 81

duchess, Enna. They had a

son, Laban, and a daughter,

Racha (spelled also Ratha,

Rachaym, Rathaym). Laban

died before his father.

Saptan, duke from Bohemia 42 81-123

married Racha. They had

a son, Salamet (Salamer),

and a daughter, Semna

(Sanna, Senna). Salamet

died unmarried before his father.

Rolant, a Bohemian duke 52 123-175

marries Semna. They had a

son, Rattan, a daughter,

Amama II (Amania), and

another son, Jannat (Jannas,

Jannet, Jamer). Rattan

and Amama died without heir

before their father.

Jannat (Jannett Janner), 51 175-226

changed the name of his

inheritance from Rarasma

to Corrodancia. Married

a Bohemian duchess called

Samanna. They had a son,

Manton (Montan). With him

ended the predominance of the

Jewish faith, and the land

lapsed again to Heathenism.

Manton 45 226-271

In his time heathen from Hungary and other lands forced Manton to

become a heathen and to pray to images. "He called himself Manton, a

Heathen." He married a heathen duchess from Hungary, named Signa. They

had two sons, Natan (Mathan) and Reptan. Reptan died young and

unmarried.

END OF JEWISH PREDOMINANCE

The sudden influx of heathenism in the hitherto predominantly

Jewish patrimony was due to a mass migration from the east. This was

the period of the last famous Odin or Wodan -- king of the Saxons from

256-300. He led numerous tribes from Eastern Europe following the Roman

attack upon Dacia (the modern Romania). The story of Wodan will be made

plain in a succeeding chapter.

Natan, married a duchess 51 271-322

from Hungary named Salymna

(Salynna). They had two

sons, Salanata and Hemna

(Hemma, Henna, Honna). The

latter died without heir.

Salanata, married a 41 322-363

Bohemian duchess called

Alamynn. They had one

son, Rattan, a heathen.

Rattan, married a Bohemian 32 363-395

duchess, Sympna (Synna,

Symna). They had a son,

Fultan (Sultan, Fulkan,

Fullan) who died without

heir before his father.

Rolant, a heathen Hungarian 51 395-446

duke was established in

Corrodancia by the Romans.

He brought along his wife,

a Bohemian duchess called

Salympna (Salymna). They

had one son, Sattan.

Sattan, married a Hungarian 51 446-497

duchess, Samynna. From now

on the dukes in Corrodancia,

were Catholic nobles. Sattan

and Samynna died without an

heir.

The Romans established Amman, a noble count, in Corrodancia. He

secretly believed and practiced Catholicism.

Amman, changed the name 43 497-540

of the land from Corrodancia

to Avara. He brought along

his wife Helena, a secret

Christian. Later known as

"St. Amman" and "St. Helena,"

they converted much of the

population. When the Romans

found it out they slew Amman

and many of the people, but

not Helena. They had three

sons, Johanns, Albrecht, and

Dietreich. A11 three

became dukes of Avara and

changed the name to Osterland.

They split the land and Johanns

became the chief over his two

brothers.

Johanns, married a 32 540-572

noble countess from Rome

called Anna. They had no

heir. Albrecht became

duke of Osterland, since

Dietreich died shortly

after Johanns.

Albrecht, changed the 31 572-603

name of the land from Osterland

to Oesterreich -- now the

official name of Austria. He

married a duchess from

Bohemia, Katherin. They had

a son Eberhart, a daughter

Ann, and another son, Johanns.

Johanns and Anna died shortly

after their father.

Eberhart, married Osanna, 32 603-635

a duchess from Bavaria.

They had two sons, Jacob

and Albrecht. They both

died before father and

mother Thereafter the land

was turned into a margraviate.

Hainreich, duke from Bohemia 30 635-665

was given Austria by the

Roman emperor. Hainreich

(Henry), became Margrave of

Austria. He brought with

him his wife, a duchess from

Hungary named Ursula. They

had no heir.

Otto -- Hainreich granted 18 665-683

Austria to Otto of Hungary.

He styled himself "Otto,

by the grace of God, Margrave

of Austria and Duke of Hungary."

Married a duchess from Bohemia

called Elsbet. They had two

sons, Chunrat and Johans.

Johans died young.

Chunrat, made the 50 683-733

margraviate a dukedom. He

styled himself "Chunrat,

by the grace of God a

Roman king, always a

multiplier of the empire,

and duke of Austria. His

wife was Anna, a Hungarian

duchess. They had three

sons, Hainreich, Steffan

and Albrecht. They split

the land and Albrecht

became chief.

Albrecht, married a 49 733-782

Bohemian duchess, Salme

(Salome). They had two

sons, Ludweig and Fridreich.

They divided the land.

Ludweig, was the higher 32 782-814

duke in Austria. Married

a duchess from Hungary

named Elena. They had a

son, Johannes and a

daughter, Dorothea, who

died before her father.

Johannes, married a duchess 49 814-863

from Bohemia called Anna.

They had one son, Hainreich.

Hainreich, married a 31 863-894

duchess from Hungary named

Ursula. They had three

sons, Johanns, Steffan

and Philipp. Steffan and

Philipp died young.

Johannes, married Margareta, 28 894-922

duchess from Bohemia. They

had two sons, Albrecht and

Ludweig. Albrecht died

unmarried prior to his father.

Ludweig, married a duchess 42 922-964

from Hungary called Elsbet.

They had one son, Albrecht.

Albrecht, married a duchess 28 964-992

from Bohemia, Osanna. They

had two sons, Ott and Hainreich.

Ott died unmarried prior to his

father.

Albrecht was a contemporary of Leopold, duke of the rising House

of Babenberg. Leopold was appointed by Otto II of Germany as supreme

ruler of the Austrian mark.

Hainreich, or Henry, 28 992-1020

succeeded; married a

Hungarian duchess called

Margareta. They had two

sons, Peter and Johanns,

and a daughter, Elisabet

(Elspeth).

Peter and Johanns 1 1/2 1020-1021

Johanns was duke jointly with

Peter of Austria for a year

and a half, when he died

without wife and heir. Peter 3 1021-1024

succeeded as duke for three

years and also died without

heir. His dukedom passed

to the Babenbergs.

In 976 the chief authority in Austria had passed to the House of

Babenberg. The powerful rule of the Babenbergs -- and the

interrelationships of the royal families -- may be found in any

thorough English or German history of Austria. The Babenbergs became

extinct in 1246. Thereafter the realm passed into the hands of the

famous Hapsburgs.

With this the history of early southeastern Europe, which began in

the days of Abraham, closes.

CHAPTER V

THE CONQUESTS OF ODIN AND DANISH HISTORY

Many a school boy has heard of Odin, the great Norse hero. But how

many realize that Odin was a real king of Denmark? That he founded the

kingdom of Denmark in the days of David, king of Israel? That he

visited Solomon's temple? of that Odin was the first Danish king to

cross the Atlantic -- as did Danish Vikings centuries later?

For centuries Danes revered the history of their nation. Not until

the atheistic educational philosophy of German schools permeated their

country did the Danes discard the early history of their nation. Modern

historians, imbued with the idea that myth was the only form in which

early man knew how to write, treat all Danish history as myth. They

have never investigated to see whether it were so. of course myth was

grafted in the Middle Ages on the early history of Denmark. That

tragedy befell all nations under the sway of religious superstition in

the Middle Ages.

But that does not prove that the essential core of early Danish

history is invalid. Today historians labor under the delusion that

history was artificially created after traditional mythology had long

been established. Not so. Recorded and traditional history around the

world was carefully preserved in palaces and royal libraries. Only

later did myth embrace history,

WHAT THE HISTORY OF DENMARK REVEALS

Now is the time to restore the lost history of Denmark. The most

accessible outline of Danish history is that found in Anderson's "Royal

Genealogies". Many other volumes contribute to the story, but only

Anderson's work correctly preserves in English the chronology of the

early period.

Danish written history properly begins with the first king to bear

rule over the Danish or Cymbric peninsula. That king was Danus I. In

Danish history he is also called Dan I. He was the first Odin or Votan

-- from the Hebrew "adonai" meaning "lord."

Denmark originally received its name from the tribe of the Danaan.

It passed to the king who took the name of the subjects over whom he

ruled.

King Dan I commenced his reign in 1040. This was the year of the

break-up of the German realm. The division of German territory among

the three sons of Wolfheim -- Kells, Gall and Hiller -- left the

seafarers of the far northwest of Europe without leadership. To fill

the void the German and Hebrew inhabitants of Denmark called upon the

scion of the Trojan House to reign over them. That scion was Dan I. He

lived at the time in Thrace.

THE GENEALOGY OF DAN I

The present kings of Northwestern Europe and Great Britain are all

related to Dan I of Denmark. The "Saxon Chronicle" commences the line

of Dan I with the following two names: "Noah, Sem." Thereafter a long

break occurs in the genealogy -- similar to the Biblical statement:

"Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham" (Matthew l:l).

This gap in Odin's genealogy is partially filled in by the

Icelandic "Langfedgatal". After Sem, the "Langfedgatal" gives the

following genealogy on Odin's father's side:

"Saturnus of Krit

Jupiter

Darius

Erichhonius

Troes

Ilus

Lamedon

Priam, King of Troy

Minon or Memnon, who married Priam's daughter. Their son was Tror,

whom we call Thor, the father of Hloritha.

Thor

Einridi

Vingethorr

Vingener

Moda

Magi

Seskef, or Sescef."

In Danish literature Seskef -- sometimes spelled Sceaf -- is a

title of Odin. It means a "sheaf" of grain. Odin claimed to be a kind

of savior, or a lord. He laid claim to being the sheaf that

symbolically represented the Messiah (Leviticus 23:9-14).

But why should Dan I, a king of Denmark, copy a ceremony

perpetuated by the law of Moses? Is there a connection between Odin and

Israel?

The answer is found in who Saturnus of Krit, ancestor of Odin,

really was. In modern English the name would be Saturn of Crete. There

were many Saturns in antiquity, often confused with one another.

Usually the name was applied to a man who flees or who hides himself.

Saturn is a Latin word derived from a root meaning to flee into

hiding. The Greek term was Kronos. This particular Saturn of Crete was

so famous that the Phoenician historian Sanchoniathon spoke of him.

Fragments of his works have been preserved by Eusebius in "Preparation

of the Gospel", book i, ch. x. Here are his words: "For Kronus or

(Saturn), whom the Phoenicians call Israel ...." ("Corey's Ancient

Fragments of the Phoenician, Carthaginian, Babylonian, Egyptian and

other Authors", by E. Richmond Hodges, page 21.)

Israel was the name of Jacob. That would make Odin a son of Shem

and a son of Jacob. But why was Jacob called Saturn? Because Jacob

became famous for fleeing or hiding from his enemies. Jacob's mother

warned him of his brother Esau's wrath: "Now, therefore, my son,

hearken to my voice; and arise, flee thou to Laban my brother in Haran"

(Genesis 27:43). "And it was told Laban ... that Jacob was fled" --

this time back to Palestine. (Gen. 31:22).

But how is one to account for the title to Crete in Jacob's name?

Certainly Jacob did not have title to it prior to descending into

Egypt. The answer is, Jacob obtained it from Pharaoh in Egypt.

Here are the facts. Egypt was a vast Mediterranean power in the

days of Jacob. One of the areas early settled by Egyptians was the

island of Crete, an important naval gateway in the Mediterranean. From

Crete -- Caphtor in Hebrew -- came the Philistines (Jer. 47:4 and Amos

9:7). The Philistines descended from Mizraim, father of the Egyptians

(Gen. 10:13-14). Ruling over the Egyptians and Philistines in Crete and

the eastern Nile Delta was a little-known dynasty of Egyptian kings.

They are mentioned in the "Book of Sothis" by Sncellus. Manetho does

not include them among his dynasties.

The king of this dynasty, who was subject to the jurisdiction of

the great Pharaoh in Egypt, was Rameses (l744-1715). Because of

Joseph's service to the Egyptian government, the Pharaoh transferred

primary title to the Land from the line of Rameses to the line of

Israel -- and that included not only Goshen, but Crete!

And that is how Israel (Jacob) anciently obtained title to the

island of Crete.

The "Langfedgatal" genealogy of Odin of Denmark may therefore be

clarified as follows:

Saturnus of Krit -- Israel or Jacob (1856-1709)

Jupiter, son of Saturn of Krit -- Judah

Darius, descendant of Jupiter (Judah) -- is Dara or Darda (see the

family name in I Chronicles 2:4,6); Josephus calls him Dardanus

(1477-1412); he fled Italy and founded Troy (the Norse geneaology skips

the names of Tarah and Mahol between Judah and Darda)

Erichhonius -- Ericthonius (1412-1366), second king of Troy

Troes -- Tros (1366-1326), third king of Troy

Ilus -- Illus (1326-1277), fourth king of Troy

Lamedon -- Laomedon (1277-1233), fifth king of Troy

Priam -- Priamus (1233-1181), king of Troy during first Trojan

war.

Eighth in descent from Priam was Seskef, who was Danus I or Odin

(Votan), first king of Denmark -- 1040-999. Odin was a Hebrew, of the

line of Judah, from whom the chief rulers were to come. "For Judah

prevailed above his brethren, and of him came the chief ruler" (I

Chron. 5:2).

Now consider over whom Odin ruled in Northwest Europe.

"HU THE MIGHTY"

King Danus' realm extended far beyond the reaches of the Danish

peninsula. The people over whom he ruled were a collection of tribes

which constituted the greatest sea power of the time -- the Pelasgians

or sea people. From the list of sea powers, commented on in Volume I of

the Compendium, it is proved that the Pelasgians were Hebrews and their

allies. Their chief center of habitation was Palestine. Denmark was one

of several overseas settlements. Israel gained power in 1057, shortly

before the break-up of Germany in Europe. They retained it until 972,

when Solomon's kingdom in Palestine was split. For the Israelites to

have obtained dominion of the sea in 1057 in the Mediterranean and

Atlantic presupposes that they already were living along the western

shores of Europe before that date.

When and how did the Children of Israel migrate to Western Europe?

The answer is found in Cymbric or Welsh history.

A fragmentary Welsh record, called the Welsh Triad, reads as

follows: "First was the race of the Cymry, who came with Hu Gadarn to

Ynys Prydain." Hu came from "the land of summer" -- a land located

somewhere in what later constituted the realm of Constantinople (the

capital of the eastern Roman Empire). He journeyed to Ynys Pridain --

the Welsh name of the Isle of Britain. This first major settlement

preceded the migration in 1149 of Brutus of Troy to Britain.

Who was Hu Gadarn? Gadarn is a Welsh word. It means the "Mighty."

Hu was a short form of the Old Celtic name Hesus ("Origines Celticae",

by Edwin Guest, vol. 2, p. 9). Hesus is the Celtic -- and also the

Spanish -- pronunciation of Jesus. Was there a famous "Jesus" who lived

in the balmy summerland of the eastern Mediterranean centuries before

the time of Jesus the Christ? Most certainly! It is found in Hebrews

4:8, "For if Jesus that is, Joshua) had given them rest, then would he

not afterward have spoken of another day."

Jesus was merely the Greek form of the Hebrew name Joshua. Hu or

Hesus the Mighty was Joshua the Mighty, the great general who led

Israel into Palestine. And the Welsh Triad records that in his later

years he also settled Israel peaceably in the British Isle. From there,

for trading purposes, they spread to the coasts of the continent which

were subject to the German Cymry -- the descendants of the German king

Cimbrus (1679-1635). That is how Israel in Denmark came to be known by

the tribal name of Cymry.

As time elapsed the peninsula of Denmark became a chief area of

trade and commerce. It is strategically located to dominate both North

and Baltic sea trade. So together with the original German tribes of

the Cymry and Dauciones were migrants from Britain. In 1040 the Hebrew

Cymry called for a descendant of Judah, a royal scion of the House of

Troy, to rule over them. Odin answered the call and led a migration out

of Thrace into Denmark and neighboring regions. The deeds of Odin upon

becoming king over the Cymry (sometimes spelled Cymbri) will be

included in a later section on the American Indian.

THE KINGS OF DENMARK

Below is the genealogical and historical line of Judah that

descended from Odin. Through intermarriage the line of Odin has

permeated throughout Western Europe. Small wonder that the lion of

Judah is the symbol on the coat of arms and shields of the royalty of

Northwestern Europe.

Kings of Denmark Lengths of Reign Dates

1. Danus I, or Odin 41 1040-999

first king of Denmark

2. Humblus, son of Odin 8 999-991

3. Lotherus, son of Odin 17 991-974

4. Boghius 5 974-969

5. Scioldus, son of Lotherus 80 969-889

6. Gram (or Gran) 31 889-858

Slain by Suibdagerus, a

king of Norway, in battle;

wives were Groa a Swede,

and Signe of Finland.

7. Suibdagerus 40 858-818

King of Denmark, Sweden,

and Norway, who, by force,

married Gran's daughter and

conquered Denmark.

8. Guthormus, son of Queen Signe 14 832-818

Reigned 14 years contemporary

with Suibdagerus.

9. Hadingus, another son of 54 818-764

Signe and Gram

10. Frotho I, son of Hadingus 77 764-687

11. Haldanus I, son of Frotho 56 687-631

12. Rhoe, son of Haldanus 63 631-568

13. Helgo, son of Haldanus 34 628-594

Reigned contemporary with

his brother.

14. Rolvo, son of Helgo by his 41 568-527

own daughter Ursa. Became

king after death of Rhoe;

was killed by Attile, king

of Sweden, who conquered

Denmark.

15. Hotherus, great-grandson 42 527-485

of Hadingus, son of king

Hotobrodus of Sweden.

King of Denmark and Sweden.

16. Roric Slyngeband, son of 49 485-436

Hotherus

17. Wigletus, son of Roric 48 436-388

18. Guitalchus 32 388-356

19. Vermundus, son of Wigletus 61 356-295

20. Uffe, son of Vermundus 30 295-265

21. Danus II, son of Uffe 37 265-228

22. Hugletus the Little, son 52 228-176

of Danus II

23. Frotho II, son of Hugletus 30 176-146

DENMARK ENTERS ROMAN HISTORY

24. Danus III, son of Frotho 69 146- 77

In his time the German

Cymbrians joined the

Teutons in a terrible war

against Rome in 113.

Italy would have been

conquered if the consul

Marius had not defeated

them utterly.

25. Fridlevus I, the Swift, 37 77- 40

son of Danus

26. Frotho III, the Pacific, 54 40- 15

son of Fridlevus ("A.D.")

King of Denmark, Sweden

and Norway.

INTERREGNUM for nearly 4 years 15- 19

27. Hiarnus, a poet 2 19- 21

28. Fridlevus II, son of Frotho 12 21- 33

29. Frotho IV, the Liberal, 46 33- 79

son of Fridlevus

30. Ingellus Wendemothius, 23 79-102

son of Frotho

31. Olaus I, son of Ingellus 10 102-112

32. Haraldus I, reigned 5 112-117

contemporary with brother

33. Frotho V, brother of 19 112-131

Haraldus

34. Haraldus II, son of 10 131-141

Haraldus I

35. Haldanus II, son of 15 131-146

Haraldus II

Reigned 10 years

contemporary with

brother, 5 years alone.

36. Unquinus, king of Gothland, 9 146-155

succeeded son-in-law

Haldanus in Denmark.

37. Sivaldus I, son of

Unquinus 22 155-177

38. Sigarus, son of Sivaldus 13 177-190

39. Sivaldus II, son of 11 190-201

Sigarus

INTERREGNUM -- Rule of 40 201-241

5 governors

40. Haldanus III, married 20 241-261

Guritha, granddaughter

of Sigarus.

41. Haraldus III, (Hilletand 66 261-327

or Hilderand), son of

Haldanus; died in Sweden

after a seven-year war,

during which time his

daughter Haditha governed

Denmark.

42. Olaus II, brother of 4 327-331

Haditha

43. Osmund, son of Olaus 10 331-341

44. Sivardus I, son of 9 341-350

Osmund

45. Buthlus, brother of 1 350-351

Sivardus

46. Jarmericus, son of 16 351-367

Sivardus

47. Broderus, son of 2 367-369

Jarmericus

48. Sivaldus III, son of 9 370-379

Broderus

49. Snio (or Sino), son of 22 379-401

Silvaldus.

The next seven kings lived mostly abroad. They succeeded each

other as father and son.

50. Roderic 10 401-411

51. Sueno I 55 411-467

52. Guitlachus 50 467-517

53. Haraldus IV 46 481-527

54. Eschyllus 16 527-543

55. Veremundus 78 543-621

56. Osmund II 75 621-696

The following kings

lived in Denmark.

57. Biorno 4 696-701

58. Baldrus, son of Biorno 6 701-707

59. Haraldus V, son of Baldrus 8 707-715

60. Gormo I, son of Haraldus 50 715-765

61. Gotricus or Godfrey or 45 765-810

Sigfrid, commences

invasions of England 787

62. Olaus III 1 810-811

Because Gotricus became

the great legislator of the

Danes, his reign is often

begun from the year 777 as

follows:

Gotricus (or Godfrey), 33 777-810

called Sigfrid

Olaus III or Olabus 2 810-812

Continuing:

63. Hemmingius or Hemmingus or 4 812-816

Heningus

64. Sivard II 2 816-818

65. Ringo, contemporary with 2 816-818

Sivard II

66. Regner 13 818-831

67. Harald VI 3 818-821

68. Sivard III, the last 3 831-834

heathen king of Denmark.

CHRISTIANITY INTRODUCED ON THE THRONE

69. Eric I, the first king of 1 834-835

Denmark to adopt

Christianity.

During much of this and the preceding period Denmark was plagued

by joint reigns, disputed succession, and lesser kings who seized on

part of the realm. Whole tribes left the peninsula to settle

permanently in England. They were called Danes, but were, in fact, of

Anglo-Saxon stock.

70. Eric II, called Barno, 24 835-859

the Child

71. Canute I, surnamed the 20 859-879

Small

72. Frotho VI 1 879-880

73. Gormo II (or Guthran or 13 880-893

Gormund)

74. Harald VII, Parcus, or the 8 893-901

Niggard

75. Gormo III or Guthram or 30 901-931

or Godrum or Gormund

76. Harald VIII, called Blaatand 48 931-979

77. Sueno II or Suen-Otto, 35 979-1014

called Forked Beard

78. Ericus, King of Sweden 7 988-995

became King of Denmark

in 988 for 7 years, till

slain by his own servants,

when Suen-Otto was

restored by Scottish

assistance.

79. Canute II or King Knut 21 1014-1035

the Great, united

Scandinavia under his

realm, it fell apart

at his death. Became

king of England 1016.

From this date on any thorough work on Denmark will satisfactorily

present its history. With the death of Canute a period of 2074 years

ended since the founding of the monarchy.

CHAPTER VI

SCOTLAND -- KEY TO HISTORY OF NEW WORLD

The Key to the history of the New World has been lost. Not a

single historian or archaeologist knows the true origin of American

Indian civilization. And no wonder! They have thrown away the keys to

that history. One of those keys will be found in Danish history. The

other -- and most important -- key in the checkered history of rugged

Scotland.

WHAT HISTORIANS CLAIM

The famous eight-volume "History of Scotland", by John Hill

Burton, begins the history of Scotland this way: "It is in the year 80

of the Christian era that the territory in later times known as

Scotland comes out of utter darkness, and is seen to join the current

of authentic history. In that year Julius Agricola brought Roman troops

north ...."

This is a typical -- but mistaken -- view of Scottish history.

Historians have made an idol out of Roman records. What the Romans

either refused to preserve, or carelessly neglected to record, is all

too often treated with contempt by modern historians. Scotland was

never long under the Roman heel. The Romans were not particularly

interested in its rocky highlands. Consequently they did not occupy

themselves with recording the major events of the past that befell its

inhabitants.

Today, numerous documents are available covering the history of

Scotland from very early times. These chronicles are usually disparaged

in historical circles -- or at most treated as quaint and curious

documents. But to restore the lost history of Scotland from them is

frowned on with disdain.

Yet in these records are the missing links which, until now, have

sundered the Old World from the New. It is time the true story of

Scotland were made known. Here, in outline form, are the major events

that make Scottish history.

FIRST MAJOR SETTLEMENT

The geographic location of Scotland is important in its history.

Scotland is the link between Scandinavia and Britain and Ireland. Its

shores provide control of the far reaches of the North Sea and the

ocean. Scotland was consequently invaded, peaceably and by frightful

devastation, several times in its history.

The first permanent settlement of Scotland, for which we have

recorded history, begins with the coming of Danus I of Denmark in 1040.

When the Cimbric tribes called upon an heir of the Trojan throne to

establish his domain in Denmark, Odin responded immediately.

Out of southeastern Europe he marched into Denmark. Coming with

him was a mixed tribe known as the Agathyrsi. Agathirsi was their name,

declares an old Scottish Chronicle. ("Controversial Issues in Scottish

History", by W. H. Gregg, p. 125.) Odin settled them in Scotland under

their leader Cruithne -- after whom they were called Cruithnians or

Cruithne. Herodotus, the Greek historian, traces the Agathyrsi to their

origin in the Scythian plains of what is now the southern Ukraine The

Agathyrsi were a mixed race. Various struggles led to a catastrophe

among the Agathyrsi who came with Odin. They found themselves without

women!

As a consequence they sought wives among neighboring tribes. They

landed in Ireland at the time of the establishment of the Milesian

monarchy under Ghede the Herimon (1016-1002). Following a few

skirmishess an agreement was reached. The Milesians of Ireland agreed

to give wives to the Agathyrsi from their daughters on one condition:

that the Agathyrsi would pass on their inheritance through their

daughters, not their sons. This was to acknowledge that any royalty

which might follow derived kingship from their Milesian wives, not from

the Agathyrsi men.

On this condition the Agathyrsi departed again for Scotland.

LINE OF JUDAH IN SCOTLAND

The women who journeyed in that day to Scotland were Milesians --

of the family of Mileadh. In volume I of the Compendium the history of

the kingly line from Mileadh to the present throne in Great Britain was

given in its entirety. Its ancient connection with the throne of David,

in Judah, was made plain. But the genealogy of Mileadh was not

included.

The line of Mileadh, in Irish records, properly begins with Easru

in Egypt. The name Easru is Old Irish for Ezra or Azariah.

Easru was a friend of Moses. One Irish tradition has him crossing

the Red Sea with the children of Israel. Another tradition has him

journeying, after the Exodus, to Scythia. Irish annalists became

confused by these two movements of Easru and his family. It never

occurred to them that he might have crossed the Red Sea with Moses, and

then, at a later time journeyed to Scythia.

No Irish records preserve the ancestry of Easru or Azariah. Many

myths were later created by Irish monks to account for this blank. It

seems not to have occurred to them that the Bible might record the

ancestry of Easru, ending at the Exodus.

The previous volume of the Compendium established the significant

fact that the symbol of the line of Easru and Mileadh was the Crimson

or Red Branch -- signifying the royal line Zarah, Judah's son (Genesis

38:30). Now open the Bible to the genealogy of Judah. "And the sons of

Zarah: Zimri, and Ethan, and Heman, and Calcol, and Dara .... And the

sons of Ethan: Azariah" (I Chronicles 2:6, 8).

Here is an Azariah, of the family of Judah -- and of Zarah, the

Red Branch. Azariah was of the same generation as Moses -- both were

great-great-grandsons of Jacob (compare with Exodus 6:16-20). Notice

also that Azariah's descendants did not enter Palestine. His genealogy

is not continued beyond the Exodus. That is significant.

Further, the name Azariah in Hebrew is often shortened to Ezra

(see any Biblical encyclopaedia). Its Old Irish form would be Easru. So

here we have an Azariah (or Ezra), of the same generation as Moses,

Living at the time of the Exodus, whose descendants did not settle in

Palestine, and who was of the Crimson Branch. At the same time Irish

history reveals an Easru -- Old Irish for Azariah or Ezra -- living in

Moses' day, crossing the Red Sea, but not settling in Palestine, whose

descendants in after generations used the symbol of the Crimson Branch!

Here is the line of Zarah -- Judah! Easru is Azariah, Judah's

great-great-grandson.

In chart form (from the Bible and Stokvis' Manuel) the Milesian

princely line appears thus:

Jacob

Judah

Zarah

Ezra

Ethan

Azariah, who is Easru

Sru

Eibher Scot

Beogamon

Ogamon

Tait

Agnamhan

Lamhfinn

Heber Glunfionn

Agnonfinn

Eimhear Glas

Nenuaill

Nuadhat

Aldoid

Earchada

Deaghata

Bratha

Breogan

Bile

Mileadh

Ghede the Herimon, now gave daughters of the royal family to the

Cruithne. From these noble women sprang a line of kings that finally

united with the Scots in the person of Kenneth Mac Alpin in 843.

In after ages the Cruithne came to be known, falsely, as Picts.

The true Picts were another people altogether -- an uncivilized people

who painted themselves. Because the Cruithne ruled over the Picts who

lived in the Scottish highlands, later writers called them both

"Picts." The wild, unsettled Picts later disappeared from Scotland.

Where? -- historians do not know. But Scottish history tells!

But first, to summarize the story of the half-Jewish kings who

descended from the Cruithnians and the Hebrew Milesian women.

EARLIEST HISTORY OF SCOTLAND

The complete king list -- and an accurate chronology of all the

kings of the Cruithne -- has come down to us in the "Pictish

Chronicle." The record begins with the first settlement of the

Agathyrsi in 1040. That is the year they were planted in Northwest

Europe by Odin of Denmark, who led them out of their ancient homeland

in Thrace.

The "Pictish Chronicle" begins with the name of Cruithne and seven

sons, who divided the Scottish realm between them. The entire period

from the first migration in 1040 to the death of Cruithne and his sons

was 100 years. Thereafter the royal line was inherited from the

mother's side, not the father's, in accordance with the original

agreement with the Milesians.

The following chart is taken from the "Pictish Chronicle."

King's Names Lengths of Reign Dates

Cruidne (or Cruithne), 100 1040- 940

son of Cinge (or Kinne),

father of the Agathyrsi

dwelling in Scotland.

The seven sons of Cruithne:

Circui 60

Fidaich 40

Forteim 70

Floclaid 30

Got 12

Ce, that is, Cecircum 15

Fibaid 24

The entire period of Cruithne and his seven sons is contained in

the 100 years assigned to Cruithne. None of the sons' reigns can be

dated. The kingship after 940 was passed on to the following:

Gedeolgudach 80 940-860

Denbacan 100 860-760

Finnechta (Olfinecta) 60 760-700

Guididgaedbrecach 50 700-650

Gestgurtich 40 650-610

Wurgest 30 610-580

Brudebout 48 580-532

"From Brudebout descended 30 kings of the name of Brude, who

reigned during 150 years in Ireland and in Albany," records the

Chronicle. Albany was the seat of authority in Scotland. The following

names indicate that the realm was divided into numerous principalities

-- probably 15 -- over each of which two generations of kinglets

reigned.

Thirty kings by name of Brude 150 532-382

Brude Gest Brude Uleo

Brude Urgest Brude Gant

Brude Point Brude Urgant

Brude Urpoint Brude Gnith

Brude Leo Brude Urgnith

Brude Feth Brude Gart

Brude Urfeichir Brude Urgart

Brude Cal Brude Clnd

Brude Urcal Brude Urclnd

Brude Cint Brude Uip

Brude Urcint Brude Uruip

Brude Feth Brude Grith

Brude Urfeth Brude Urgrith

Brude Ru Brude Muin

Brude Ero Brude Urmuin

Gilgidi 101 382-281

Tharan 100 281-181

Morleo 15 181-166

Deocilunan 40 166-126

Cimoiod, son of Arcois 7 126-119

Deord 50 119- 69

Bliciblitherth 5 69- 64

Dectoteric, brother of Diu 40 64- 24

Usconbuts 30 24 B.C.- 7 A.D.

Carvorst 40 7- 47

Deoartavois 20 47- 67

Uist 50 67-117

Ru 100 117-217

Gartnaithboc 4 217-221

Vere 9 221-230

Breth, son of Buthut 7 230-237

Vipoignamet 30 237-267

Canutulachma 4 267-271

Wradech Vechla 2 271-273

Garnaichdi Uber 60 273-333

Talore, son of Achivir -- 75 333-408

(Nectanus, a contemporary

Pictish king was slain in

361)

Drust, son of Erp or Irb 45 408-453

Though the "Pictish Chronicle" continues the history of the

Cruithne without interruption, it is important that the list be stopped

here to discover who Drust, the son of Erp, was.

EARLY LINE OF SCOTTISH KINGS

Erp is the Pictish name for the Scottish Erc. Who was this Erc?

Late Scottish historians confused this Erp or Erc with Erc the

father of Fearghus. Fearghus mac Erc reigned 513-529. This was about a

century after Drust mac Erp (or Erc). The two Ercs are not the same

person. This is clearly proved by all early Scottish historians. "In

two particulars at least, none of the early writers have disagreed:

that in the year 503 an invasion of Caledonia took place under the

leadership of Fergus mac Erc, and that he and his followers had come to

stay" ("Controversial Issues in Scottish History", Gregg, page 35).

Then who was the other Erc whose son, a century earlier, returned

to rule over the Picts? The answer is found in the early history of the

Scots who migrated from Scythia in the year 331-330.

In 331 Alexander the Great overthrew the Persian realm. Many

nations who had been held in virtual slavery gained their freedom. One

of these people was the House of Israel. Israel was invaded in 721 by

Shalmaneser of Assyria. After a three-year siege her people were taken

into captivity. Ezekiel, over a century later was given a vision in

which he saw that the House of Israel would not be released from their

enslavement until 390 years had elapsed from the time of the siege of

Samaria (Ezekiel 4:3-5). It was precisely 390 years from 721, when the

siege against Samaria began, to 331, the date of the final overthrow of

Persia and the deliverance out of captivity of the Hebrews. Some of

them immediately commenced a migration to the land settled long before

by their brethren. In the year 331-330 they journeyed out of Scythia to

Scotland -- the word Scotland originally meant the land of the Scyths.

In Scotland they sent to Ireland for a Scythian-Mileslan prince, of the

line of Mileadh, to rule over them. A prince was dispatched, together

with a small army. His name was Fergus, the son of Ferquhard. It was

his family from which Erp or Erc, the father of Drust, king of the

"Picts,'' sprang. Before returning to complete the line of "Pictish"

kings, we shall present a summary of the earliest kings to rule over

the Scots in Scotland. (It should be remembered that Scotland and

Pictland were but two of several early divisions of that land now known

as Scotland.)

This material is taken from Boethus and Buchanan. The correct

outline is that preserved in Anderson's "Royal Genealogies". Buchanan

mistakenly shortens the total of the dynasty 16 years. But Roman

history confirms the longer form preserved by Anderson on page 753.

First Kings of the Lengths of Reign Dates

Scots

1. Fergus 25 330-305

He died in shipwreck off

the coast of Ireland,

where he went to quell

some commotions.

2. Feritharis 15 305-290

Brother of Fergus succeeds,

since Fergus' sons are too

young.

3. Mainus 29 290-261

Fergus' younger son chosen

king, the older, Ferlegus,

being condemned for

conspiring in his uncle's

death.

4. Dornadilla 28 261-233

A son of Mainus

5. Nothatus 20 233-213

Dornadilla's brother; his

own son too young to succeed

to the throne. A very

cruel and despotic ruler,

he was slain.

6. Reuther 26 213-187

Dornadilla's son. Dowal,

the murderer of Nothatus,

exercised great influence

over the still young Reuther.

7. Reutha 17 187-170

Son of Nothatus, cousin

of Reuther. Reuther's

brother rules for his

nephew, who is only ten

years old. Reutha

resigned the government

in favour of Thereus his

nephew.

8. Thereus 12 170-158

Reuther's son. A cruel

and unwise tyrant, driven

into exile in his twelfth

year, Conan elected viceroy.

9. Josina 24 158-134

Thereus' brother. He

greatly honored physicians,

as he had been educated

among them.

10. Finnan 30 134-104

Josina's son. Established

that kings should not

decide on great matters

without authority of the

great council. Ne was

devoted to Druidical

superstitions.

11. Durstus 9 104- 95

Finnan's son. A vile and

debauched ruler. Pretending

to reform his life, he

invited the nobles and had

them slain. He was slain

in the ensuing battle.

12. Evenus 19 95- 76

Paternal cousin to Durstus.

Exacted oath of

allegiance from his subjects.

13. Gillus 3 76- 73

A crafty tyrant, slain by

Cadwal, his viceroy, in

battle.

14. Evenus II 17 73- 56

Son of Doval; grandson

of Josina.

15. Ederus 48 56- 8

Son of Dochamus, Durstus'

son.

16. Evenus III 7 8- 1

A wicked and licentious

king; the son of Ederus.

He was put in prison by

the nobles and there

murdered by a fellow

prisoner.

17. Metellanus 29 "1 B.C."- 29 "A.D."

Son of Ederus' brother.

18. Caractacus 20 29- 49

Son of Cadallanus and of

Eropeia, Metellanus' sister.

19. Corbred I 18 49- 67

Caractacus' brother.

20. Dardanus 4 67- 71

Metellanus' nephew. A

cruel and licentious ruler,

he was captured in battle

and beheaded.

21. Corbred II. 35 71-106

Corbred's son. After many

battles with the Romans,

he died at peace.

22. Luctacus 3 106-109

A licentious prince, son

of Corbred II. He was

slain by his nobles.

23. Mogaldus (Mogallus) 36 109-145

Grandson of Galdus and

maternal nephew of

Lactacus, son of the

sister of Corbred II.

Started his reign well

but ended it in the ways

of his predecessor. Was

slain by the nobles.

24. Conarus 14 145-159

Mogaldus' son. He was a

partner in the conspiracy

against his father. He

himself was a lecherous

tyrant, was put in

prison after only 2 years.

Argadus became governor;

Conarus was finally slain

in prison in 159.

25. Ethodius 33 159-192

Mogaldus' sister's son.

He was murdered for

personal reasons by an

Irish harper.

26. Satrael 4 192-196

Ethodlus' brother, the son

was not yet mature enough.

This man murdered the

nobles and friends of

Ethodius, so he could do

away with the sons, in

order to keep the reign

in his family. Was finally

strangled by his own

servants.

27. Donald I. 21 196-217

Another brother of

Ethodius. The first

"Christian king" of

Scotland. First to coin

gold and silver money in

the land.

28. Ethodius II. 21 217-238

Son of Ethodius, an

intellectually weak and

base-minded man. Directed

by his nobles, slain by own

officers.

29. Athirco 12 238-250

Son of Ethodius. Began

his reign decently, but

degenerated and committed

suicide when pursued by

his nobles. Athirco's

brother, Dorus, flees

from the noble Nathalocus

with the three sons of

Athirco.

30. Nathalocau 12 250-262

A son of Athirco's brother,

he usurped the kingdom; was

a cruel tyrant and was slain

by the nobles.

31. Findochus 11 262-273

A son of Athirco. A

good ruler, he was slain

by his own brother at the

instigation of Donald the

Islander.

32. Donald II. 1 273-274

Findochus' brother. In

battle Donald is wounded

and dies shortly after.

33. Donald III 12 274-286

Donald the Islander

usurped the kingship

without any right to it,

and ruled very cruelly.

He was finally slain by

Crathilinthus.

34. Crathilinthus 24 286-310

The son of Findochus, who

was hidden for years.

After a long series of

battles with the wild

Picts, and after

purging the land of

the idolatrous superstition

of the Druids and

enforcing Christianity, he died.

35. Fincormach 47 310-357

Crathilinthus' cousin.

A just ruler.

36. Romachus 3 357-360

Son of oldest brother of

Crathilinthus. Obtained

the kingdom by force from

the two sons of two other

brothers of Crathilinthus.

Defeated incursions of the

wild Picts. His murder

ended his evil reign.

37. Angusianus 1 360-361

Son of a brother of

Crathilinthus. Angusianus

was slain in battle with the

Picts' king Nectanus.

38. Fethelmachus 3 361-364

Son of the third brother

of Crathilinthus, Devastating

the forces of the Picts in

battle, they sent assassins

who murdered the king.

39. Eugenius I (Evenus) 12 364-376

Fincormach's son. He was killed in battle against the Romans and

their Pictish allies. The Scottish kingdom was obliterated. The dead

king's brother, with his son Erc, and his grandson, fled to Denmark

where he was received by Sivaldus III. The Scottish population

scattered throughout Scandanavia.

The Romans soon turned on the Cruithne -- who were still dwelling

in Pictland along with the wild Picts. The Cruithne were miserably

oppressed. After three decades they came to an agreement with the Scots

and promised to restore the Scots to the throne if they would deliver

them from oppression. The son of Erc or Erp returned in 408 at the head

of a Scottish army, delivered the Cruithne and restored the throne.

This son of Erc or Erp was not Ferghus, as later traditions assumed,

but Drust, who became the new king of the Cruithne or Picts. Drust was

famous in poetry for having fought 100 battles and lived 100 years. As

he ended his reign in 453, he was born 353. He was therefore only 23

years old at the time of the flight of his grandfather and father.

Before continuing the remarkable history of the wild Picts which

culminated in 503 in Scotland, we should continue with the line of

Scottish kings who now sat on the throne over the Cruithne (or the

Agathyrsi Picts).

KINGS OF CRUITHNE CONTINUED

Kings of the Cruithne Lengths of Reign Dates

(Drust, son of Erp or Erc 45 408-453)

Talore, son of Aniel 4 453-457

Necton Morbet, son of Erp 25 457-482

Drest Gurthinmoth 30 482-512

Galanau Etelich 12 512-524

Dadrest 1 524-525

Drest, son of Gyrom 1 525-526

Drest, son of Udrost, reigned 5 526-531

jointly with Drest, son of Gyrom

Drest, son of Gyrom, 5 531-536

continues to reign alone

Gartnach, son of Gyrom 7 536-543

Cealtraim, son of Gyrom 1 543-544

Talorg, son of Muircholaich 11 544-555

Drest, son of Munait 1 555-556

Galam, with Aleth 1 556-557

Galam, with Brideo 1 557-558

Bride, son of Mailcon 30 558-588

Gartnaich, son of Domelch 11 588-599

Nectan 20 599-619

Cineoch, son of Luthrn 19 619-638

Garnard, son of Wid 4 638-642

Bridei, son of Wid 5 642-647

Talore, brother of the two 12 647-659

former kings

Talorcan, son of Enfret 4 659-663

Gartnait, son of Donnel 6 663-669

Drest, brother of Gartnait 7 669-676

Bridei, son of Bill 21 676-697

Taran, son of Entisidich 4 697-701

Bredei, son of Derili 11 701-712

Necton, or Naitan, son of Derili 15 712-727

Drest and Alpin reigned together 5 727-732

Onnust, or Oengus, son of Urgust, 31 732-763

or Fergus

Bredei, son of Uiurgust 2 763-765

Kinoid, or Kinoth son of Wirdech 12 765-777

Elpin, or Alpin son of Wroid 3 777-780

Drest, or Durst son of Talorgan 4 780-784

Talargan, son of Onnust 2 784-786

Canaul, son of Tarla 5 786-791

Castantin, or Constantine, son 30 791-821

of Urguist, or Fergus

Unnust, or Hungus, son of Urguist 12 821-833

Drest, son of Constantine, and 3 833-836

Taloran, son of Utholl, reigned

together.

Uwen, or Eogan, son of 3 836-839

Unnust

Wrad, son of Bargoit 3 839-842

Bred Brude 3 842-845

Keneth MacAlpin, first king 16 843-859

of all Scotland, united line

of Cruithne (or "Picts")

with the Milesian Scottish

line of Ferghus mac Erc.

This completes the history of the Picts who descended from the

intermarriage of the Cruithne and the Judaic Milesian royal house. From

the reign of Kenneth MacAlpin the history of the throne of David has

already been presented in volume I.

But what befell those wild, tribal Picts who gave their name to

the Cruithne -- and who painted themselves? Remnants of them continued

to be referred to as late as the seventeenth century. Most of the

population, however, suddenly disappeared in 503 upon the coming of the

Milesian Scots out of Ireland under the leadership of Fearghus mac Erc.

Those wild Picts were the people who left the many strange and

intriguing remains in the Northern Isles of Britain -- the mounds, the

flint knives, the stonehewn tombs, the carvings. The next chapter

explains the link between Scotland and the New World.

CHAPTER VII

THEY CROSSED THE ATLANTIC

The origin of the American Indian has puzzled Europeans from the

day Columbus' sailors set foot on the Caribbean isle. Yet, just four

centuries earlier, the New World was common knowledge to the educated

in North Europe and the Iberian Peninsula. Its natives were even

embracing the faith of the Roman Church, which had appointed an

Icelander of noble birth as bishop over Iceland, Greenland and the

lands of the New World! How did these facts all become lost?

THE LITTLE ICE AGE

One is so accustomed to read of "Ice Ages" as events of the remote

past, that it hardly occurs to the mind that thirteenth century

Europeans witnessed a veritable Little Ice Age that completely severed

communications between Europe and the New World. The Baltic froze over.

Vikings ceased to traverse the inhospitable Atlantic. In the New World

the Land of the White Man -- Hvitramanna Land in Icelandic literature

-- lost contact with Europe. Centuries later remnants of their

population were found among the natives which had early traversed the

Atlantic with them.

This chapter unfolds what really happened in Western Europe, and

especially the British Isles and Denmark, from the days of Solomon to

long after the fall of the Roman Empire. It will explain the astounding

chronological connection between the rise of New World civilization and

the sudden flight of tribes out of Northwest Europe.

WHITES DID NOT BECOME INDIANS

First, let us immediately banish a myth. White Europeans did not

become Indians by merely settling in the New World and becoming lost!

The American Indians are not the "Lost Tribes of Israel," or Egyptians.

The American Indian looks as he does because his ancestors appeared

that way before they traversed the waters of the Atlantic.

It may come as a surprise to learn it, but Europe and the

Mediterranean world was early -- and comparatively late -- inhabited by

"Red Men." Everyone has heard of the famous Phoenician sailors of the

ancient Mediterranean world. They are known to have traveled far out

into the Atlantic and to Northwestern Europe. The Greeks called them

Phoenicians because that is what they were -- "Red Men." The word

"Phoenician" is derived from the Greek word for reddish dye. The

ancient Egyptians painted the Phoenicians on their walled tombs and on

papyri. Their skin color? Reddish. The Egyptians painted other peoples

of Palestine white and black. They recognized three races of men living

in Palestine in early ages.

Julius Firmicus, an early writer, stated that "in Ethiopia all are

born black; in Germany, white; and in Thrace, red." Thrace was north of

Greece and originally populated by the children of Tiras, son of

Japheth (Gen. 10:2). It was from Thrace that Odin led the Agathyrsi and

other tribes to Northwestern Europe when he founded the Danish kingdom.

Many of the warriors employed by the early princes of western

Europe were fierce, of swarthy skin, naked and often tatooed and

painted. Strabo, the Roman geographer, wrote that areas of Ireland and

Britain were inhabited "by men entirely wild." Jerome, writing in one

of his letters in the fifth century, characterizes some of them as

cannibals: "When they hunted the woods for prey, it is said they

attacked the shepherd, rather than his flock; and that they curiously

selected the most delicate and brawny parts, both of males and females,

for their horrid repast."

In the eighteenth century, Martin, in his volume "Western Islands

of Scotland", remarked that the complexion of the natives of the isle

of Skye was "for the most part black;" and the natives of Jura were

"generally black of complexion," and of Arran, "generally brown, and

some of a black complexion." The inhabitants of the Isle Gigay were

"fair or brown in complexion." The American Indian -- commonly called

the Red Man -- varies from copper brown to almost black, and, of

course, almost white in some tribes.

And the famous literary companions Johnson and Boswell several

times took notice of the swarthy color of some of the natives in the

north and west of Scotland (Croker's "Boswell", 1848, pp. 309-310, 316,

352). "There was great diversity in the faces of the circle around us,"

wrote Boswell; "some were as black and wild in their appearance as any

American savages whatever." "Our boatmen were rude singers, and seemed

so like wild Indians, that a very little imagination was necessary to

give one an impression of being upon an American river."

A writer at the beginning of the nineteenth century characterized

the people of Harris: "In general the natives are of small stature ....

the cheek bones are rather prominent. The complexion is of all tints.

Many individuals are as dark as mulattoes, while others are nearly as

fair as Danes" ("Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal", No. vii, pp.

142, 143).

In "Pennant's Second Tour", 1772, is a line drawing of the wigwams

of the half-breed natives of the Scottish Island of Jura. Here are

natives, like American Indians, living in the remote islands of Europe,

whose last remnants died out as late as the beginning of the nineteenth

century.

AMERICAN INDIAN TRADITION

The common idea that American Indians had no means of preserving

their history is a fiction based on the assumption that all Indians

were on the same level of culture. Wild, rude tribes there were. But

civilized nations existed too. They carefully preserved, among other

things, the history of their journeys, and the duration of their

habitation in the New World. When the Spanish conquistadors arrived in

the New World they were amazed to find the Maya and Aztecs using bark

paper to preserve history and daily records. It was obtained from the

FICUS, a tree related to the mulberry. Bark was peeled off, beaten with

a rubber mallet, and folded into sheets to make books. In Moctezuma's

palace Bernal Diaz followed an "accountant" who showed him "all the

revenue that was brought ... (and recorded) in his books which were

made of paper which they call "amatl", and he had a great house full of

these books" (pages 184-185 of "The Ancient Sun Kingdoms of the

Americas", by von Hagen). Only a few escaped the book burning of the

Spanish zealots, who sought to wipe out all vestiges of the previous

culture and the lineage of their royal houses.

Some rare codices have been preserved, however. One is the "Popol

Vuh", a sacred book of the ancient Quiche Maya. In it are recorded the

migrations and wanderings of their ancestors. It traces their origin

eastward across the Atlantic Ocean to the Old World. Other Indians had

similar origins of having to cross a great body of water from the

northeast to reach their present land. (Later migrations, once they had

arrived from the east, could take any direction.)

The writer of the Popul Vuh declared: "They also multiplied there

in the East .... All lived together, they existed in great numbers and

walked there in the East .... There they were then, in great numbers,

the black man and the white man, many of many classes, men of many

tongues .... The speech of all was the same. They did not invoke wood

nor stone, and they remembered the word of the Creator and the Maker

The Maya record continues: "... they came from the East ... they left

there, from that great distance .... they crossed the sea" (pp. 181,

183). When they sought to establish their kingdom "they decided to go

to the East .... It had been a long time since their fathers had died

East, there whence came our fathers.' Certainly they crossed the sea

when they came there to the East, when they went to receive the

investiture of the kingdom" (pp. 206-207).

To what line of great kings in the east were these Quiche Maya

journeying? To the successors of the great ruler who conducted them,

about 1000 B.C., to the Usumacinta River in Mexico.

ENTER VOTAN

The Mayas claim that their kingdom was founded by a great eastern

ruler named Votan or Oden or Dan by various tribes. He was a white man

who came by sea from the east and settled them in their new land. The

time of their migration, according to Ordonez, was ten centuries before

the present era. This Votan -- who was also worshipped as a god -- was

famous for having himself journeyed to a land where a great temple was

being built.

Do we have a king in Europe, living at the time Solomon's temple

was being built (around 1000 B.C.), who had dominion over the seas, who

was worshipped as a god, and whose name sounded like Votan? Indeed --

Woden or Odin, king of Denmark from 1040-999. He was worshipped later

as a great god. Scandinavian literature is replete with accounts of his

distant journeys which took him away from his homeland for many months,

sometimes years.

Just as king Odin or Danus gave his name to Denmark -- Danmark --

so Odin gave his name to the "forest of Dan" in the land of the Quiche

Indians. (See pages 549 and 163 of volume V, "Native Races of the

Pacific States", by Hubert H. Bancroft.) "Dan ... founded a monarchy on

the Guatemalan plateau" (Bancroft, vol. I, p. 789). His capital, built

for the Indians and their white suzerains, was named Amag-Dan.

Here we have the records of Danish kings, as early as 1000 years

before the birth of Christ, sailing to the New World and planting

colonies of Red Men from Europe in the Yucatan and Guatemalan

highlands. Is it any wonder that it was the Danes, of all nations of

Europe, who continued to communicate with the New World in the days of

Eric the Red? It was the king of Denmark who ruled over Iceland in the

days of Christopher Columbus. Before Columbus awakened the sleepy

Mediterranean world by his important journey across the Atlantic, he

first sailed to Iceland where he obtained information for his fateful

voyage.

And is it not significant that it was an Icelandic nobleman, Eric

Gnupson, who was consecrated by Pope Pascal II as Bishop of Greenland

and the neighboring regions ("regionumque finitimarum") in 1112? (See

"Conquest by Man", Paul Herrmann, p. 287.)

EARLY TIME OF MIGRATION

Tradition universally assigns white leadership to every major

recorded historic migration of the American Indian from far to the

northeast. The later history of Mexico commences with the establishment

of a monarchy by the Toltecs of Mexico. The Toltecs were of white

descent. They led and ruled over the Indians and spoke their languages.

Charnay wrote in the "North American Review", October 1881, "Physically

Veytia describes the Toltec as a man of tall stature, white, and

bearded." A carved head of a "noble Aztec," on display in the National

Museum, may be seen on plate 40 in George C. Vaillant's "Aztecs of

Mexico". The noble Aztec was not an Indian at all, but a Norseman!

Little wonder that wherever the Spanish journeyed they found the ruling

classes much lighter than the people over whom they ruled. On occasion

the conquistadors thought their women as fair or fairer than their

Spanish women.

"The Annals of the Cakchiquels -- Lords of Totonicapan" contains

direct reference to the racial descent of the nobles who led and

governed the natives to the New World.

"These, then, were the three nations of the Quiches, and they came

from where the sun rises, descendants of Israel, of the same language

and the same customs .... When they arrived at the edge of the sea,

Balam-qitze (a native title for one in a religious office) touched it

with his staff and at once a path opened, which then closed up again,

for thus the great God wished it to be done, because they were the sons

of Abraham and Jacob. So it was that those three nations (the "mixed

multitude" of Exodus 12:38) passed through, and with them thirteen

others called Vukamag" -- meaning the 13 tribes. Israel had altogether

13 tribes including Levi.

"We have written that which by tradition our ancestors told us,

who came from the other part of the sea, who came from Civan-Tulan,

bordering on Babylonia" page 170. Page 169 says they ".... came from

the other part of the ocean, from where the sun rises." (Translated by

Delia Goetz; published by University of Oklahoma Press, 1953.)

Was the mysterious Civan-Tulan -- meaning in Indian dialects a

place of caves or ravines -- the region of Petra, where Moses led the

Children of Israel? Petra is famous for its caves. Canaanite Hivites,

mixed with Egyptian stock, dwelt at Petra, or Mt. Seir, at the time of

the Exodus (Genesis 36:2, 20, 24). They lived at peace with the

Hebrews.

This settlement of Hivites was a region dominated by Midian. A

high priest who visited the land of Midian and Moab in Moses' day was

named Balaam -- almost the exact spelling in the Quiche-Maya title

Balam used for priests!

The people led by Odin or Votan across the Atlantic to the New

World were not exclusively the sons of Tiras from Thrace; some tribes

were called Chivim, reports Ordonez the early Spanish writer. It is the

very Hebrew spelling used for the English word Hivites, some of whom

once lived in Mt. Seir, the land of caves, near Babylonia! So the

Mexican Indians were a mixed people.

CHRONOLOGY OF MEXICO

No continuous history of the Quiche-Maya civilization is extant.

We have now to turn to the Valley of Mexico for direct and surprising

connection with the movement of events in Scotland where dwelt the

Picts and the Maiatai (Greek for Maia folk).

From Scottish history, covered in the previous chapter and in the

first volume of the Compendium, it can be established that major

migrations occurred in the years 376 -- when the Scots and allies were

driven out and the Picts miserably oppressed -- and in 503 -- when the

Scots from Ireland drove out most of the remaining wild Picts or

painted men. Where did these folk flee to? Can we establish a direct

connection between these events in Pictland with the history of

migration to the Valley of Mexico of the Toltecs and others in the New

World?

Indeed we can.

The nation of the Scots was utterly driven out by the Romans in

the year 376. The Cruithne and Picts, who remained in the land as Roman

allies, were soon miserably oppressed. Rebellion broke out. The Romans

dealt severely with the fleeing rebels. The Cruithne and Picts besought

and obtained Scottish help to drive out the Romans and their British

allies.

Now compare this with the migration of the Toltecs and their white

chieftains to Mexico. The historian of the Toltecs was Ixtlilxochitl.

He reports several migrations over the centuries. But the one he takes

special note of -- for its chronological import -- commenced in 387.

(See Bancroft's "Native Races of the Pacific States", Vol. 5, pp. 209,

214.) The events were these -- a rebellion broke out that led to a

protracted struggle for eight years. The rebels were finally forced to

flee in 384 for protection. After remaining 3 years (to 387) they

continued their lengthy migration. It was now 11 years after the

initial rebellion. Eleven years before 387 is 376 -- the very year the

Romans drove out the Scots and suppressed the Painted Red Men of

Pictland! Is this mere coincidence? Their migration took them over

water and land till they reached Jalisco in Mexico. To do so they must

have landed in the traditional area of the Usumacinta River, crossed

the isthmus, and coasted to Jalisco on the southern extremity of the

Gulf of California. After wandering many years they settled in

Tulancingo. "The third year of their stay in Tulancingo completed ...

one hundred and four years since the departure from the country,"

records Bancroft from Ixtlilxochitl (vol. v, p. 213). (The 104 years

compose two Indian calendar cycles of 52 years each.) It was now 488.

At Tulancingo they remained another 15 years -- to 503. In 503

they migrated to the Valley of Mexico to the region of Lake Texcoco.

What caused them to migrate in 503? Is this a significant date in

Scottish history? Indeed. That was the year the Scots from Ireland

finally settled in Scotland and drove the wild Pictish tribes out of

the country.

Strengthened by a new influx of migrants, the Toltecs journeyed

(in 503) to the already-settled shores of the lake on which Mexico City

now stands. There, at Tullan, for six years the Toltecs lived under a

theocratic republic, each chief directing the movement of his band in

war and directing their needs in times of peace. "But in the seventh

year," records Bancroft, "after their arrival in Tollan, when the

republic was yet in a state of peace and prosperity, undisturbed by

foreign foes, the chiefs convened an assembly of the heads of families

and the leading men. The object of the meeting was to effect a change

in the form of their government, and to establish a monarchy." It was

agreed to accept, as king, a son of a neighboring Chichimec king to be

supreme ruler. "Immediately after the accession of the young monarch"

in 510, "a law was established by him and his counsellors to the effect

that no king should reign more than fifty-two years, but at the

expiration of this term should abdicate in favor of his eldest son,

whom he might, however, still serve as adviser. Should the king die

before the allotted time had elapsed, it was provided that the state

should be ruled during the unexpired term by magistrates chosen by the

people" (pp. 244, 246).

This custom continued firmly established among the Toltecs at

Tullan for many years. Later the practice was discontinued, though the

Mexican Indians still continued to count time by 52 year cycles. The

history of the American Indian from 510 to the coming of the Spanish

has been carefully preserved by Ixtlilxochitl and in the Annals of

Cuauhtitlan.

Modern writers in previous decades often carelessly discounted the

value of these Indian records. But archaeology is forcing a renewed

respect for the history of the New World as preserved by the native

writers during the earliest days of the Spanish colonial period. The

most readily accessible -- and one of the best works -- on early Mexico

is -- "Aztecs of Mexico", by G. C. Valliant, revised by Suzannah B.

Valliant. Another useful source is Stokvis' "Manuel".

THE HISTORY OF TOLTECS AT TULLAN

The history of Tullan is the history of the Mayapan culture of

Mexico. Earlier cultures are commonly found, but no continuous history

exists before 510. The Toltecs were not the carriers of the culture of

Teotihuacan, as is often stated by archaeologists (see p. 6 of Penguin

edition of "The Aztecs of Mexico" by Valliant).

The following is a summary of the history of Tullan (or Tula),

restored in accordance with the earliest extant Aztec and Toltec

records. Bancroft's "Native Races of the Pacific States" may be

consulted for the full story of events. It is a treasure-house of

information.

(Note that the "x" in Aztec names is pronounced as "sh.")

Toltec Kings of Tulan Lengths of Reign Dates

according to Ixtlilxochitl

Period of the Tullan 7 503-510

Republic under chieftains

Chalchiuhtlanetzin 52 510-562

Ixtlilcuechahauac 52 562-614

Huetzin I 52 614-666

Totepeuh I 52 666-718

Nacoxoc 52 718-770

Mitl-Tlacomihua 59 770-829

Queen Xihuiquenitzin 4 829-833

Izaccaltzin 52 833-885

Topiltzin I 74 885-959

A struggle with Chichimecs occurred during the reign of Topiltzin.

Topiltzin was forced to flee leaving authority in the hands of the

royal family of Ihuitimal. The confused conditions are reflected in the

joint rulership presented in the next short succeeding chart. The

parallel reigns also indicate that Toltec leadership was divided among

powerful city-state princes in the growing Toltec Empire which spread

itself in the Valley of Mexico.

Toltec Kings Lengths of Reign Dates

Mixcoatl Mazatin 65 804-869

Texcaltepocatl Huetzin 28 869-897

Ihuitimal 28 897-925

(or 36) (887-923)

Topiltzin I 22 925-947

(or 24) (923-947)

The above chart indicates Ihuitimal succeeded his father in 897,

but, according to the Annals of Cuauhtitlan, he replaced the fleeing

Topiltzin in 887. Topiltzin returned in 923. Ihuitimal ended his reign

two years later. Though Topiltzin continued on the throne to 959 (see

first chart), he was succeeded in 947 as follows.

Kings of Tullan Lengths of Reign Dates

according to the Annals

of Cuahtitlan

Matlacxochitl 36 947- 983

Nauhyotzin I 14 983- 997

Queen Xiuhtlaltzin 4 997-1001

Matlaccoatzin 24 1001-1025

(or 28)

(997-1025)

Tlilcoatzin 21 1025-1046

Huemac 75 1046-1121

Huemac is another name of Quetzalcoatl (Bancroft Vol. III, pp.

267, 283-4). He was a ramous white man who came from the east with a

religion that banned human sacrifice and used the symbol of the cross.

The name Quetzalcoatl, was originally that of an early Aztec god.

It was applied by Aztecs to any great priest who claimed to represent

the deity. Huemac Quetzalcoatl disappeared and returned on several

occasions during his 75 years, leaving the supreme government, in his

absence, to contemporaries of the royal house. This white priest became

famous over much of the New World. Who was he? And what religion was he

bringing?

The answer is found by the date of his death 1121. Was there a

famous white priest, with jurisdiction over areas of the Western

Hemisphere who died in 1121?

Yes! Icelandic Bishop Eric Gnupson, whose domain included the New

World! He died in 1121, the same year that Quetzalcoatl did. At his

death in 1121 the Icelandic Thing (Parliament) met to request the pope

that a new bishop be appointed (Conquest by Man, by Herrmann, pp. 286

-287) . The religion of Quetzalcoatl was Roman Catholicism. When the

Spanish missionaries later came to the Indians they were amazed to find

so many parallels to the Catholic religion -- holy water, nuns,

rosaries, the cross, penances and other traditions!

Contemporary with Huemac Quetzalcoatl were the following Tullan

rulers:

Huemac II Atecpanecatl 35 1046-1081

Topiltzin Acxitl 33 1081-1114

Matlacxochitl Huemac III 2 1114-1116

Veytia gives 1116 as the date of the final overthrow of Tullan at

the coming of the Aztecs (Hist. Ant. Mej., bk. 1, pp. 287-304. ) See

also Bancroft, vol. 5., p. 325.

THE CITY-STATE OF CULHUACAN

A major expansion of the Toltecs occurred at the close of the end

of the fourth 52 year cycle -- in 718. In that year a branch of the

royal lineage founded Culhuacan. It suffered a major reverse in the

year 1063 at the hands of the Chichimecs who established a new dynasty

in Texcoco. The following chart covers the kings of Culhuacan until

that defeat.

Kings of Culhuacan Lengths of Reign Dates

Nauhyotl I 50 718- 768

Mixcohuatl Camaxtli 78 768- 846

Totepueh I Nonohyatcatl I

Yohuallatonac I 59 846- 905

Quetzallacxoyatl 49 905- 954

Chalchiuh-Tlatonac I 32 954- 986

Totepeuh II 41 986-1027

Nauhyotl II 36 1027-1063

For five years (1063-1068) the local government of Culhuacan was

in the hands of a Toltec noble Xiuhtemoc, to whom the late king's

children were confided. The year after the defeat, a young son of the

king was placed on the throne under the tutelage of Xiuhtemoc.

Kings of Culhuacan Lengths of Reign Dates

Nauhyotl III 60 1064-1124

Cuanhtexpetlatzin 57 1124-1181

Huetzin 21 1181-1202

Nonoalcatl 21 1202-1223

Achitometl 14 1223-1237

Cuauhtonal 14 1237-1251

NEW LINEAGE BEGINS

Mazatzin 23 1251-1274

Quetzaltzin 13 1274-1287

Chalchiuhtlatonac II 17 1287-1304

Cuauhtlix 7 1304-1311

Yohuallatonac 10 1311-1321

Tziuhtecatzin 13 1321-1334

Xihuitlemoc 18 1334-1352

Coxcox 24 1352-1376

Acamapichtli 12 1376-1388

Achitometl 12 1388-1400

Nauhyotl 13 1400-1413

The central government in the Valley of Mexico now passed into the

hands of the Aztec ruler of Tenochtitlan.

Prior to the Aztec dominion, the Chichimecs at Texcoco were a

dominant Indian tribe. Their power commenced with the defeat of Tullan

in 1063.

THE CHICHIMECS AT TEXCOCO

Chichimec Kings of Lengths of Reign Dates

Texcoco

Xolotl 17 1063-1180

After the era of Xolotl

a new lineage begins.

Nopaltzin 31 1180-1211

Tlotzin Pochotl 35 1211-1246

Quinantzin Tlaltecatzin 59 1246-1305

Techotlala 52 1305-1357

Istlilxochitl 61 1357-1418

(For this king Valliant has

mistakenly dropped out an

entire cycle of 52 years in

his reign.)

Nezahualcoyotl 54 1418-1472

Nezahualpilli 44 1472-1516

Cacama 3 1516-1519

Spanish land in Vera Cruz, native rulers to 1550 continued with

limited authority. During part of the reign of Istlilxochitl, two

tyrants of Tepanec dominated the country. They are below.

Tepanec Tyrants at Lengths of Reign Dates

Azcapotzalco

Tezozomoc 84 1343-1427

Maxtla 2 1427-1429

THE AZTECS

The Mexican Indians were, at the coming of the Spanish, under the

Aztec sway. Many tribes readily accepted Spanish assistance to aid them

in the overthrow of their oppressive rulers. They had yet to learn that

new oppressors were coming in the guise of deliverers. The following

outline illustrates the gradual rise to power of the Aztecs. The story

of the final overthrow of the Aztec capital Tenochtitlan is so

generally narrated as to need no repetition here. The city was

established under Tezcuecuex in 1202 at the end of the reign of Huetzin

of Culhuacan.

Aztecs of Tenochtitlan Lengths of Reign Dates

Tezcuecuex 33 1202-1235

Huitzilhuitl, called Mexi, 63 1235-1298

after whom Mexico receives

its name.

Culhuacan seized Tenochtitlan. The city again became independent

under Tenoch in 1325.

Tenoch, after whom the city of 11 1325-1336

Tenochtitlan was named.

Tlacotin 1 1336-1337

Teuhtlehuac 12 1337-1349

LINEAGE BEGINS:

Queen Ilancueitl 34 1349-1383

Acamapichtli, reigns 8 years 20 1375-1395

contemporary with previous

queen.

Huitzilhuitl II 19 1395-1414

Chimalpopoca 14 1414-1428

Itzcoatl 12 1428-1440

Montezuma I 29 1440-1469

Azayacatl 12 1469-1481

Tizoc 5 1481-1486

Ahuitzetl 17 1486-1503

Montezuma II, in his reign 17 1503-1520

the Spanish arrived.

Cuitlahuac 4 months 1520

(murdered on way to Honduras)

The history of the Peruvian civilization must wait until Spanish

history is presented.

Other cities of lesser import have left us a record but those

present here give the chronological outline from which a valid study of

Mexican history can begin.

CHAPTER VIII

THE HISTORY OF SPAIN

Who would guess today, from reading Spanish history, that Spain

was, in Old Testament times, one of the most important countries in the

world? That famous Biblical characters as Togarmah and Seir the Horite

and Tarshish made their appearance in this fabulous land?

Today the early history of Spain is virtually unknown. Scholars

treat it in much the same fashion as the history of every other nation

in Europe. Her past -- before Roman rule -- is made to appear a

chronological blank. What little is written before that time mainly

emphasizes broken pottery and similar artifacts.

The real history is vitally interesting. It holds the key to the

settlement of the Peruvian Indian in Latin America. Spain was also the

link between Palestine and Ireland. Whoever controlled Spain was in a

position to dominate the Western Mediterranean.

ONLY RECENTLY SUPPRESSED

Until very recent times Spanish writers took pride in presenting

their national history. They were not ashamed of it. Today, in the face

of "higher criticism," Spanish scholars have suppressed the truth of

her beginnings. What once was recognized to be fact is now relegated to

the limbo of myth for no other reason than early Spanish history reads

very much like the Bible!

Early Spanish history does not begin in Spain. It begins far to

the east -- in the lands bordering the ancient Assyrian Empire.

Similarly, the history of the Hebrews of the Bible does not begin with

Palestine, but with the land of the Chaldeans in Mesopotamia. In its

earliest period the history of the Iberian Peninsula is not primarily

the story of the Spanish people at all. It is the history of other

people who migrated through that land, or temporarily dominated it.

Few books in English preserve the history we are now entering

upon. The two works most readily available in libraries are Anderson's

"Royal Genealogies" and the 20 volume "Universal History", published in

1748. The Spanish material is contained in volume xviii.

Our story opens in Asia Minor, in the region of the city of

Tarsus. Paul the apostle was born here. Tarsus was a port first settled

by the children of Tarshish. From Tarsus in Cilicia they gradually

migrated into Spain, where they founded the city of Tartessus. The

earliest homeland of the children of Tarshish in Asia Minor was

originally ruled over by Tubal, son of Japheth. Spanish history begins

with his government at Babel.

The land about Tarsus in Asia Minor long bore the name of Tubal.

The Assyrians, in their cuneiform documents, referred to it as Tabal.

It extended from the area of what is eastern Turkey today into the

Caucasus to the Russian plains.

The most valuable area in the ancient land of Tabal was the

excellent farming and trading region of Iberia in the Caucasus -- the

modern Georgia. From this vast area, the descendants of Tubal migrated

into the Russian steppes. But their subjects, the children of Tarshish,

migrated westward toward Spain. Early Spanish history is in a sense the

story of the Spanish people, but the record of their foreign rulers.

The following outline summarizes the important events preserved of

the early history of the Spanish people beginning from the Tower of

Babel.

EARLIEST KINGS OVER THE SPANISH

Name of Rulers Lengths of Reign Dates

Tubal 156 2254-2098

Grandson of Noah (Gen.

10:2). Came to power at

Babel. Ruled over territory

in eastern Asia Minor (Turkey)

where Tarshish, the father of

the Spaniards, originally

settled.

Iberus, a son of Tubal 37 2098-2061

He gave his name to the

entire peninsula, which

is still known as the

Iberian Peninsula. Later

his descendants migrated

from Spain to Iberia in

the Caucasus.

Eubalda (or Idubeda) 64 2061-1997

Son of Iberus, last of

the line of Tubal to

rule over the children

of Tarshish.

Brigus 52 1997-1945

Son of Mash, the son of

Aram (Gen. 10:23). Previously

settled a colony in Eastern

Europe under Asshur; now

leads a colony to Spain

by sea. An Aramaic large

nosed element may be seen

in the Spanish population

to this day.

The ancient city

of Damascus, Syria, was

named after his father Mash.

Brigus (Brigo) organized

his people into pastoral

units (whence our "brigades"),

which multiplied so rapidly

that colonies were forced

to leave Spain in search

of new homes. Some of his

children from Europe early

carried his name into Phrygia

(Asia Minor). There the

family became associated with

Meshech, brother of Tubal.

Brigo's father, Mash, became

known by the name Meshech

(I Chr. 1:17).

Brigo's family in

Spain soon became associated

with the children of Togarmah,

who next entered Spain.

Tagus Ormah 30 1945-1915

The Togarmah, son of Gomer,

of the Bible (Gen. 10:2).

Late Latin writers split his

name into two syllables, and

added Latin "-us" ending.

Togarmah invaded Italy one

year after his domination of

Spain. Both were yet sparcely

populated lands and afforded new,

hospitable areas. During his

reign he sent many bands to

seek habitations elsewhere,

ultimately passing eastward

into the far northern reaches

of Asia (Ezekiel 38:6).

The Tagus River of Southern

Spain was named for him.

Bet(us), or Boetus, 32 1915-1883

(or 31) (1915-1884)

son of Togarmah; Bet(us)

gave his name to the Bet(us)

river (now called Guadalquivir).

In his day the children of

Tarshish, known as Turditanians,

in Spanish histories, settled

the southwestern part of

Spain. Boetus encouraged

the development of learning.

The children of Betus were

soon forced to migrate

out of Europe, with the rest

of the family of Togarmah, and

at length settled in Tibet -- which

means the plateau of Bet! The

family of Togarmah was superseded

by an invasion from the south.

INVASION FROM AFRICA

Having become again a civilized land and wealthy due to changes in

climate and the presence of many gold mines, Spain aroused the cupidity

of Egyptian and other North African nations. Gerion or Deabus, a

Lybian, with many men and ships invaded and conquered Spain and forced

the Spaniards to dig gold for their African overlords. African cultural

elements were introduced. Many Spanish slaves died from overwork under

this tyranny. The history of this period is as follows:

Rulers of Spain Lengths of Reign Dates

(continued)

Gerion, the giant 34 1883-1849

(or 35) (1884-1849)

Gerion was the seventh

generation from Ham. He

descended through Cush,

Saba (the Seba of Gen. 10:7),

Gog, Triton, Ammon and

Hiarba (compare the last

name with the Biblical "Arba"

of Joshua 15:13, who was the

father of the Anakim glants).

The Lomnini 42 1849-1807

The Lomnini were three giant

sons of Gerion. They were

allowed to continue to rule

in the land after an invasion

in 1849 by an Egyptian army under

Osyris Denis (Dionysius in

Greek).

Osyris slew Gerion in 1849, upon which part of his tribe took to

ship and sailed to the New World. A tradition found among the Toltecs

of Mexico and preserved by Ixtlilxochitl declares there once were

giants in their land.

Even the date of the arrival of these giants has been preserved by

the Toltec historian. It was 520 years after the flood. (Bancroft

"Native Races of the Pacific States", vol. V, p. 209. ) The year of the

flood was 2370-2369. And 520 years AFTER the flood -- that is, after

2369 -- is 1849, the very year a great battle was fought in Spain

during which Gerion was slain and many of the giants were expelled.

Later Indian tradition records the perishing of these giants in the New

World in a struggle with the Indians.

One of the Lomnini in Spain, meanwhile, was given to wife a sister

of Osyris. A son of the union, Norac, settled Sardinia and built the

city of Norca. Sardinia is famous for traditionally being inhabited by

giants who left the megalithic remains and giant tombs. Early British

tradition also assigns to swarthy giants the building of many of the

megalithic monuments or henges.

To avenge the death of their father, the three Lomnini brothers

conspired with Typhon, brother of Osyris. Typhon assassinated his

brother Osyris.

After the death of Osyris, Hercules appears on the scene. Rather

than drench the whole land in a bloodbath, he challenged the three sons

of Gerion to personal combat -- three against one -- and slew them all.

Hercules then turned the government of southern Spain over to Hispal,

his son and one of his generals, and departed with the bulk of his army

to Italy.

Who were Osyris, Typhon and Heracles of Spanish, Italian and North

African tradition?

Note the time setting. These events are long after the death of

Nimrod (2167) or of Miebis (2037), who was the second Osiris. The dates

of these events correspond to the latter half of Dynasty II in Egypt.

It is the period of the patriarch Jacob. The Hercules of these

traditions has already been proved to be Seir the Horite. In Spanish

history Hercules is often referred to as "Oron," meaning the Horite. He

was a king of Egypt -- a descendant of Horus. He slew the giant

Antaeus, another king of Egypt, records Josephus the Jewish historian.

Who are all these supposedly mythological rulers?

The surprising answer is that they have all been listed in Volume

I -- they are kings of the second half of Dynasty II of Egypt. Notice

the parallels.

Antaeus -- an opponent of Osiris -- was a man of giant stature. So

was Sesochris (Neferkaseker), who reigned 1815-1767. Typhon, the slayer

of Osiris, was pictured as a destroyer in the Greek traditions of this

period. King Chaires (Aka) bore the title "Destroyer." His reign began

also in 1815. Following a war in Egypt against the faction of Osiris

III, he temporarily received the "united kingdoms of Upper and Lower

Egypt and the seal of the accursed one" -- Osiris.

Then who was Osiris III -- the Osiris Dionysius of Spanish

history? None other than king Sendi (the Sethenes of Manetho). His

body, according to the tradition, was cast into the Nile. Reports

Weigall of him: "No trace of the king's tomb has been found; and ... he

seems to have met with disaster at the end" ("The History of the

Pharaoh's", page 136).

And now notice Hercules in this same dynasty. Hercules -- the Seir

the Horite of Scripture -- was renowned for having subdued Libya, and

the vast territories that lie west of Egypt. He was called Heracles

Libycus. Did one of the Pharaoh's of this same period conquer Libya?

Certainly -- Necherophes. Manetho records of him: "In his reign Libya

revolted, but, on account of an unexpected increase of the moon, they

submitted through fear."

Now to continue with the outline of Spanish history. Hercules --

Seir the Horite -- put Hispal his son over the country. He could be

none other than Shobal of Genesis 36:20. It is common for a silent "h"

to appear before Spanish names. The successor to Hispal or Shobal was

Hispan, a grandson of Hercules.

Is there a grandson of Seir the Horite by that name? See the name

in Genesis 36:26 -- Eshban! He was a son of Dishon, another son of

Seir. Now it ought to be plain why Scripture records the genealogy of

this famous man. Without it, there would be no means of understanding

who the rulers of these times were. When we come to Italian history, we

shall see how they link up with the family of Jacob. Meantime, the

history of Spain in chart form is presented below.

Hispal, son of Hercules. 17 1807-1790

He built the city Hispalis,

later known as Sepila, now

Seville.

Hispanus, grandson of Heracles. 32 1790-1758

Gave his name to Hispania

(Spain) in consequence of

extending his rule (during

his first year 1790-1789)

into central and northern

regions of the peninsula

previously settled only by

wild tribes. He built towers

to control the region of

Gallicia in Spain.

Once again Spanish history has a bearing on the New World. The

attack by Hispanus on these rude tribes in the northern regions on the

shores of the Bay of Biscay is recorded in Toltec history.

Ixtlilxochitl records that a second invasion from the east occurred

2236 years after the creation of man (Bancroft, vol. v, p. 209). Notice

how this figure corresponds with both the Bible and Spanish history.

At the death of Hispanus, Hercules, that is, Seir the Horite,

reappears in Spain and Western Europe in his old age.

Hercules 19 1758-1739

Note that these dates

correspond exactly with

those of his rule in Britain

and Gaul. It is significant

that Hercules' family should

appear so prominently in

Western Europe. They must

already have been driven out

of Mt. Seir by Esau. Hercules

left no heir to the Spanish

throne He was succeeded by

one of his generals.

ABRAHAM'S CHILDREN

Hesperus 11 1739-1728

Spanish records declare

Hesperus to be one of the

two captains (not his sons)

who accompanied Hercules in

his original exploits into

Spain. He gave his name

Hesperus to Spain and Italy

which in early times were

called Hesperia Minor and

Hesperia Major respectively.

He was driven out of Spain

into Italy by his brother,

who succeeded him.

Atlas 12 1728-1716

(10) (1728-1718)

Sometimes called Italus.

A brother of Hesperus, the

other captain of Hercules,

a famous astronomer;

dethroned and exiled

Hesperus.

Josephus, the Jewish historian, also wrote about these two famous

captains of Hercules in "Antiquities", I, xv. Here are his words:

"Abraham after this married Keturah" -- Genesis 25, "by whom six sons

were born to him ..." Then Josephus names Midian, a son of Abraham,

who begat "Ephas and Ophren," called Ephah and Epher in the Bible. "It

is related of this Ophren, that he made war against Libya, and took it;

and that his grandchildren, when they inhabited it, called it (from his

name) Africa; and indeed Alexander Polyhistor gives his attestation to

what I here say; who speaks thus: ' ... from the other two (Apher and

Japhran) the country of Africa took its name; because these men were

auxiliaries to Hercules, when he fought against Libya and Antaeus.' "

Josephus understood that the two famous captains of Hercules were

the grandsons of Abraham.

Hesperus, who was later exiled in a family quarrel, was the

Biblical Ephah. Atlas, the strong man and astronomer, was Epher. It is

his line that continued to control the western Mediterranean for

several generations.

The late Greek writers at times confused this Atlas, who was also

known from Italian history as Atlas Italus Kitim (because he ruled the

land of Kittim), with another Atlas. That other Atlas was surnamed

Maurus and was the descendant, in Greek tradition, of Japetus and Asia.

Japetus or Iapetus was the Japheth of the Bible. Atlas Maurus is

associated with Spain and North Africa because his people were

migrating from the borders of Asia westward to the New World. The only

son of Japheth whose children left Western Asia and Eastern Europe was

Tiras. Atlas Italus Kitim was succeeded by a son --

Oris or Sicorus, son of Atlas 44 1716-1672

(or 45) (1718-1673)

Anus or Sicanus, son of Sicorus 31 1672-1641

(or 32) (1673-1641)

Gave his name to people whom

he led through Italy to Sicily.

From these Sicani the island of

Sicily was anciently called

Sicania.

Sicileus or Siculus, son of 45 1641-1596

Sicorus (or 44) (1641-1597)

Crossed into Italy. He changed

the name of Sicania to Sicilia.

Lusus, son of Siculus 29 1596-1567

(or 60) (1567-1507)

He gave his name to Lusitania (now Portugal)

Ulus or Siculus, son of Lusus 64 1567-1503

(or 60) (1567-1507)

He was also known as Neptune.

He had great fleets of ships.

Ulus again led an army into

Sicily to aid the colonists whose

presence there was still being

opposed. At the close of his

reign, in 1503, a city was

founded on the coast of Spain

by refugees from Greece. The

year 1503 is the date of a

great devastation in Thessaly,

the flood of Deucalion, in

which many perished. In this

period -- the "neolithic" --

the inhabitants of Thessaly

were culturally like Mexican

Indians ("The Origins of Greek

Civilization", C. G. Starr, p. 17,

footnote) Again notice the

harmony of these records.

CHAOS IN SPAIN

Testa 70 1503-1433

A descendant of Triton (thus

related to Gerion), seized

southwestern Spain and called

himself king of Spain.

Romus, son of Testa 33 1433-1400

In his third year "Liber Pater,"

or Bacchus (Iacchus), reduced

Spain to his sway. He was from

the East. His title belonged

to Hesus the Mighty of Celtic

tradition. Hesus was Joshua (Jesus

in Greek). He pursued the

Canaanites and drove them

out of Western Europe

Palatuus, son of Romus 19 1400-1381

Cacus Licinius 36 1381-1345

A native prince who rebelled

and deposed Palatuus in a

year-long struggle.

Palatuus restored 6 1345-1339

In his days Erithrus, king (or 15) (1345-1330)

of Tyre, came to Spain.

Erithree, or Erithrus, king 66 1339-1273

of Tyre

Corgoras Mellicola, son of 75 1273-1198

Erithree He divided Spain

into several provinces.

Hebides or Habis, grandson 49 1198-1149

of Gorgoras (or 64) (1198-1134)

Following the recapture of Troy in 1149 many groups of people,

conquered as well as conquerors, sought new homes. As a result several

areas of western and northern Spain were populated. The Lydians

achieved dominance after 1149 over all the Mediterranean region,

heading the list of Thalassocracies or Sea Powers. Their dominion in

Spain began in 1149. Each of the Sea Powers in turn dominated Spain

until Nebuchadnezzar the Great of Babylon made Spain a part or the

Chaldean Empire for 9 years. After that, the Spaniards of Gades invited

the Carthaginians to come and rule over them. The Carthaginians

remained until expelled by the expanding Roman Empire.

TIME OF THE SEA POWERS

As ancient Troy was the key to control of the Eastern

Mediterranean, so Spain was to the Western Mediterranean. There are

noticeable variations between the two regions that are worth noting. In

volume I of the Compendium, in the chapter on Greek history, the list

for the Eastern Mediterranean appears. Below is the Spanish evidence

for the West, including the Atlantic littoral.

Sea Powers for Western Duration Dates

Mediterranean to 530

Lydians 48 1149-1101

------------------------------

Thracians 86 970-884

Rhodians 20 884-864

Phrygians 26 864-838

Cyprians 39 838-799

Phoenicians 41 799-758

Egyptians 35 758-723

Milesians 29 723-694

Carians 48 694-646

Lesbians 68 646-578

Phocaeians 48 578-530

There is a gap deliberately inserted in this list. It is similar

to attempts elsewhere to expurgate any record of the Pelasgians, who

were the Hebrews of the Kingdom of Israel. The missing item should be

Pelasgians 131 1101-970

This list indicates that the Hebrews became dominant in Spain at

the time the Lydians resettled in the Grecian world in 1101.

The 9 years of Nebuchadnezzar's dominion began in 578 and lasted

until 569, the year his insanity commenced. He gained dominion over the

Mediterranean through the Phocaeian fleets. Nebuchadnezzar established,

as his representative in Spain a long-lived hero named Aganthonius who

ruled 80 years (578-498) to the coming of the Carthaginians in 498.

With this, the early history of the Spanish is restored. Its

important connection with Biblical and secular history is obvious --

and especially so when one remembers that Spanish historians also

mention the 26 years' drought in Spain referred to in Irish Annals.

This was the famine in David's time, and precipitated the establishment

of the Hebrew throne in Ireland.

CHAPTER IX

ITALY, HOME OF PAGAN RELIGION

Nearly everyone has heard of the ancient pagan Greek and Roman

gods and goddesses. But almost no one knows that they were originally

great rulers of Italy.

The whole modern Christian world has been influenced by Roman

Catholicism. The story in pre-Roman times was the same. Instead of

paganism spreading to Rome from Greece, it really spread from Italy to

Greece.

It was the vogue of the last century to ridicule the myths of Rome

and of Greece. The gods and goddesses were regarded as mere human

inventions -- rigments of the superstitious madness of the ancients. To

admit that they were originally flesh-and-blood human beings would have

been tantamount to admitting the reality of the Bible. For several of

the heroes-made-god of ancient Italy are characters of the Bible.

ITALY IN THE ANCIENT WORLD

There is a very special reason that Italy became the home of

religious apostasy in the West. The pagan mystery religions had a very

special problem confronting them in Italy. They had to counter the

teachings of Noah!

Yes, Noah appears as a ruler in the early history of Italy! Noah

lived both sides of the Flood. He knew what life meant. Apart from him

the whole human family would have been wiped from off the face of the

earth. The world's religious leaders knew that if they were to succeed

they must, in some way, counterfeit, in Italy, the teachings of Noah --

just as later they were to counterfeit the teachings of Christ. The

parallel is exact.

To counterfeit Christ, they took Christ's name and labeled their

superstition "Christian." They began to worship Christ. "This people

honoreth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. But in

vain worship they me, teaching for doctrines commands of men" (Mark

7:6-7).

To subdue the doctrines Noah preached, they made a pretense of

following him -- claiming they were doing what he commanded them,

claiming to do it by his authority. And when Noah died they began to

worship him! They called him, in their mysteries, Janus -- the one who

could look into both worlds because he experienced the worlds on either

side of the Flood.

WHAT ITALIAN HISTORY REVEALS

The history of Italy was preserved down to Roman times. Not until

the Middle Ages was it allowed to die a natural death. What could not

be disproved was left undiscussed. The scholarly world soon forgot the

records in its possession. Those who did take note of them began

labeling them as recent inventions -- just as they did the history of

every other nation. Now let us open the pages of Italian history and

see what really occurred in ancient Italy.

The history of Italy opens -- as might be expected -- with human

government beginning at the Tower of Babel. Italian history begins

immediately after the Flood -- with the land without inhabitants for

108 years. The first family to settle in Italy, according to ancient

history, was Gomer. But why should this be so unusual, when one

considers the contemporary history of Spain?

Gomer's children generally passed eastward out of Europe into

Asia. Archaeology traces the movements of the earliest cultures of the

children of Gomer from southern Europe into Asia. (See the previous

chapter on the history of Spain under the family of Togarmah.)

Because Gomer was the earliest hero this side the Flood to

populate limited areas of Europe, it became a Middle-Age superstition

to label all the people of Europe the descendants of Gomer. Most Bible

maps are so labeled today. But they are wrong. In the very first

chapter, on the history of Germany, is proof that Shem's descendants

now inhabit Western Europe. The fiction that Gomer was the ancestor of

these people was deliberately, and knowingly, invented to cloak the

identity of the House of Israel and of the Chaldeans and Assyrians. The

Germans do not want their identity known to the world. Nor do the

Chaldeans. And the House of Israel wants to believe it is Gentile.

Now to continue the history of Italy as preserved to us from the

same sources which give us German, Spanish and early British history.

Patriarchs, Rulers and

Kings of Italy Years Dates

Uninhabited after the Flood. 108 2369-2261

Janus (Noah) plants colonies 33 2261-2228

in Mediterranean. Janus was

also called Vertumnus because

through him the seasons

continue in their cycle.

Noah exercised authority in

the period that both Shem

and Heber appear dominant on

the world scene elsewhere.

Gomer -- his son Ashkenaz 58 2228-2170

(Ochus) succeeded him.

Ochus, son of Gomer. 50 2170-2120

Camese (Ham) 19 2120-2101

Janus (Noah again) 82 2101-2019

Cranus Razenus, son of Janus 54 2019-1965

or Noah -- Shem; the name

means the crowned one, and

father of many races or peoples.

Aurunus, son of predecessor -- 43 1965-1922

Aram -- from whom descended

the Ausonians or Uzites.

Tagus Ormah (Togarmah), son 42 1922-1880

of Gomer. Togarmah augmented

and established a religious

system which came to be called

the "rites of Janus." Here was

an early parallel of the later

pagan attempt to establish its

religion on the world in the

name of Christ. Togarmah

obtained the designation Malot

because he AUGMENTED -- the

meaning of malot -- the pagan

rites. Is it not significant

that those lands most filled

with hideous pagan superstition

are the very areas settled by

the sons of Gomer and especially

Togarmah -- Tibet and

Siberia? The Tibetans acquired

their rites from Italy!

Sicanus, son of Togarmah. 30 1880-1850

His wife was Ceres, who was

worshipped as goddess of

agriculture. It was her ideas

which encouraged priests of

the pagan religion to support

themselves by living off the

agricultural labor of others.

Sicanus left only a daughter,

Proserpina, who was married

to Orcus, king of the Molossi

in Epirus. Thereafter the

government passed to petty

kings or Tyrants.

Reign of Enachi Tyrants. 30 1850-1820

This period corresponds in

part to the time of the African

invasion of Spain. Their

overthrow was recorded in Greek

myth as the war with the giants.

Were these sons of Anak?

Osiris Apis 10 1820-1810

Osyris of Egypt drove out (or 12) 1820-1808

tyrants and reigned in their

stead. He is Sendi, King of Egypt.

Lestrigonians, sons of 45 1810-1765

Neptune, the son of Osiris. (or 43) (1808-1765)

For last ten years of his

reign Hercules warred

against Lestrigo.

Heracles, Seir the Horite 30 1765-1735

in Scripture; called "Oron"

-- the Horite -- in Spanish

Literature.

Tuscus, son of Heracles. He 27 1735-1708

drilled people in art of war.

Alteus, son of Tuscus. 7 1708-1701

Hesperus, brother of Atlas. 11 1701-1690

Italus Atlantus Kittim. 19 1690-1671

(See history of Spain for his

identity.) Atlas left only a

daughter Roma (or Electra);

she was therefore of the

family of Abraham through

Keturah's son Midian, according

to Josephus and the

records of Spain.

Morges, a prince of the 20 1671-1651

Morgetae in Italy.

Cambon, son of Blasco, called 50 1651-1601

Corito or Corythus. Married (33) jointly (1634-1601)

Roma (Electra) daughter of with Roma

Atlas Kitim; she was the

concubine of a Jupiter. Sammes'

"Britannia Antiqua Illustrata"

is of major assistance in

clarifying Anderson's "Royal

Geneologies" during this

period. See also "Historia" by

Bartholome Gutierrez, page 165.

Jasius 50 1601-1551

A descendant of Jupiter, but

not from Electra. In the year

1601 the throne of Britain

had become vacant and Jasius

was chosen to fill the vacant

throne in Britain. From

Britain he ruled all Celtica

and Italy. At his death the

throne of Britain was separated

from Italy. The royal line

continues in Italy thus:

Corybantus. 48 1551-1503

Corybantus was the son of

Jasius and Cybele. He and

his mother divided Italy into

12 provinces and set over them

12 rulers, after which they

retired into Phrygia. A few

Israelites were fleeing from

Egypt at this period due to

persecution by the Egyptians.

Tyrrenus migrates with 51 1503-1452

Lydians from Asia Minor.

After his reign the unity of Italy ceased. Not until the rise of

the Roman Republic did all the numerous tribes in Italy again become

united under one government. Hereafter the history of Italy is the

story of the Kings of the Tuscans and of Kittim. The history parallel

to the Kingdom of Etruria will be presented after that of the Tuscans.

THE HISTORY OF ETRURIA

The story of Etruria or Tuscany is essentially the history of

those invading nations who dwelt in Italy, but were not descended from

Kittim. The people of Etruria were a heterogeneous group of tribes.

Kings of the Tuscans Lengths of Reign Dates

Tharcon I 23 1452-1429

(34) (1452-1418)

Abas 15 1429-1414

(15) (1418-1403)

Olanus 21 1414-1393

(23) (1403-1380)

Veibenus 42 1393-1351

(48) (1380-1332)

Oscus 34 1351-1317

(17) (1332-1315)

Tharcon II 46 1317-1271

(44) (1315-1271)

Tiberinus, expels Pelasgi 30 1271-1241

from Italy in time of

Jabin, king of Canaan.

Mezentius. 22 1241-1219

He was expelled for his

tyranny and fled to Cerytes

during the rule of Tharcon

III. Mezentius afterwards

aided Turnus against Aeneas.

Tharcon III 20 1219-1199

Ocnus Blanor 46 1199-1153

Pipinus 52 1153-1103

Nicius Fesulanus. 47 1101-1054

He expelled the Phoenicians

from the isle of Corsica,

and built the city of Nicea.

Piseus. 52 1054-1002

He is credited with several

inventions. This is the

era of Solomon and world

wide growth in culture and

in foreign trade.

Thuscus 39 1002- 963

Amnus 25 963- 938

Felsinus. 43 938- 895

He built Felsina the

metropolis of the Tuscans.

Bon 28 895- 867

Atreius 27 867- 840

Marsias 18 840- 822

Etalus 39 822- 783

Coelius 21 783- 762

Galerius Arbanus Lucumo 20 762- 742

Lukius 25 742- 717

Cibitus 82 717- 635

Lucumo Clusinus 58 635- 577

King Tarquinus Priscus of (or 38 to the time (635- 597)

Rome wasted Tuscany about of struggle

596, but at their entreaty with Rome.)

a peace was concluded in

584, By this peace they gave

to Tarquin a crown of gold,

an ivory chair, a sceptre

with an eagle at the end of

it, a purple robe embroidered

with gold, a gown and 12 axes,

which Tarquin received with

the senate's consent.

Rhaetus 20 577- 557

He gave name to the Rhetians,

a people of the Alps. King

Serbius Tullius of Rome

triumphed three times over

the Tuscans, who were at

last forced to submit.

Hyellus 44 557- 513

Porcena Clusius 58

513-455

Tolumnius Laertes 24 455- 431

Eques Tuscus 40 431- 391

Livius Fidenatus 48 391- 343

Elbius Tuscus 32 343- 311

Turrenus 41 311- 270

A major blow was struck,

beginning in 285, against

Etruria. The king

surrendered his government

to the Romans. So closed

the independent history of

the Tuscan tribes in

Etruria, many of whom now

scattered into neighboring

regions. Subordinate

princes continued as follows

until the reign of Emperor

Otho.

Titus (Tito) 40 270- 230

Volturrenus 48 230- 182

Cecinna 56 182- 126

Menippus 46 126- 80

Menodorus 36 80- 44

Mencenate 56 B.C. 44 - 13 A.D.

Seinao 23 13- 36

Scevino 33 36- 69

Otho Torentius (the 1 (actually 69

Emperor Otho) ruled only 3

months --

Jan. 15-Apr. 19, 69)

THE HISTORY OF THE LATINS

Meanwhile the descendants of the children of Kittim were being

ruled over by descendants of the family of Abraham. The famous woman

Electra or Roma was daughter of Atlas Kittim. Josephus reveals Atlas to

have been Epher, Abraham's grandson. His daughter is called the

concubine of Jupiter (see Icelandic history earlier in this volume),

From Electra, who later married Cambon, came a line of rulers who were

later accounted gods or divine heroes. The list carries us down to the

coming of Aeneas of Troy, recorded in Volume I. All these royal lines

were related to the family of Abraham.

List of Kings Length of Reign Dates

Roma, previously concubine 46 1634-1588

of Jupiter.

Romanessus, son of 79 1588-1509

Roma.

Picus 57 1509-1452

Faunus 30 1452-1422

Annus 54 1422-1368

Vulcan 36 1368-1332

Marte (Mars) sometimes 23 1332-1309

referred to as Janus.

Saturn, arrived from 36 1309-1273

Crete in 1331.

Picus, sometimes called 34 1273-1239

Jupiter.

Faunus the younger. 24 1239-1215

Latinus (Lateinos) 38 1215-1177

The year 35 of Latinus was 1181-1180. Aeneas of Troy arrived that

year (see Dionysius of Halicarnassus, I, 44). In year 38 (1178-1177)

Latinus died and Aeneas succeeded -- by the Roman non-accession year

system.

To conclude the surprising early history of Italy, here is a

slightly different mode of reckoning the earliest rulers. Anderson's

"Royal Genealogies" records, from documents extant in the sixteenth

century, the lengths of reigns from the time of Shem's settlement of

colonies in Europe. That event may be dated from the "Bavarian

Chronicle" to 2214. Gomer 127 (2214-2087); Janus or Noah 45

(2087-2042); Sabatius Saga, a son of Cush who fled Armenia via Germany

to Italy, 31 (2042-2011); Cranus 61 (2011-1950); Arunus 41 (1950-1909);

Malot Tages 38 (1909-1871); Sicanus 30 (1871-1841); Tyrants 38

(1841-1803); Osyris 10 (1803-1793); Lestrigo 33 (1793-1760); Hercules

30 (1760-1730); Tuscus 35 (1730-1695); Alteus 20 (1695-1675); Atlas

Italus Kittim 16 (1675-1659); Morges 9 (1659-1650); Camboblasco 50

(1650-1600); Jasius 49 (1600-1551); Coribantus 41 (1551-1510).

Coribantus and his mother set twelve princes over twelve provinces

and departed to Phrygia in Asia Minor. As Coribantus is otherwise

assigned a total of 48 years (1551-1503), his 41-year reign indicates

that the twelve princes governed the last seven years of his reign

(1510-1503).

CHAPTER X

THE STORY OF THE PERUVIAN INDIANS

Strange as it may seem, the Peruvian Indians preserved their

history back to Babel. Pre-Inca records specifically refer to and date

correctly the reigns of Cush, Nimrod and Horus, or Gilgamesh! Every

generation of rulers over the children of Tiras are named to the coming

of the Incas. Yet today all this has been lost to public knowledge.

MODERN SCHOLARSHIP DISCARDED THE FACTS

Modern scholars have done little to acquaint us with the true

history of early Peru. In the early centuries following the Spanish

conquest of Peru and neighboring regions, many native records came into

the possession of the conquerors. The assumption that the Incas knew

only how to tie knots in a string to remind them of the past is absurd.

Granted, the 'quipus' -- or knotted strings -- were used.

The Peruvian Indians also painted records of past events. They had

trained priests whose function was to record and repeat the traditions

of the past. The fact that the Spanish did recover the history of the

Peruvian Indians from the beginning is in itself proof that a great

many records were available. No nation which was able to achieve the

architectural wonders of the Peruvian highlands would lack the means to

preserve its heritage.

The modern view of Peruvian history is that it cannot be

established more than a century before the commencement of the Spanish

colonial period. Archaeologists have done amazingly well in recovering

cultural artifacts buried in the ground, but they have thus far been

unwilling to associate what they find with early Peruvian history found

in the authentic Indian records by the conquerors. The slightest study

of Pedro Sarmiento de Gamboa's "History of the Incas" would have

confirmed the accuracy of his outline. Archaeology everywhere

substantiates the written record wherever it has been carefully

preserved.

Sir Clements Markham has contributed heavily toward Inca and

Pre-Inca studies by his two books "The Incas of Peru" and "History of

the Incas." The former contains the list of kings from the beginning as

preserved by Montesinos. It gives just over 100 names out of which

nearly 80% have the lengths of reign preserved. Montesinos did not give

sufficient information to establish every reign, but the list is so

nearly complete that it is not at all difficult to determine

contemporary events between Peru and the rest of the world. The latter

volume preserves an invaluable outline of the Inca period.

WHAT ARCHAEOLOGISTS FOUND

Archaeologists are not settled on terminology, but they have

described Peruvian remains rather well. The story begins with an

Incipient Era of hunting and early agriculture. There follows a

Developmental Era that is usually not well divided. It ought to be

expressed in two, rather than three phases -- the Formative and the

Cultist -- to use archaeological Jargon. There is great technical

progress and a widespread religious cult. A complete break ends the

Cultist period.

Thereafter a Florescent Era appears, around 350 B.C., with many

new techniques indicative of a dynamic period. In some ways the level

of the artistic sense, however, does not advance.

Then comes a Climactic Era, commencing shortly after 500 A.D. It

is divided into Expansionist, Urbanist and Imperialist periods. The

Expansionist commences with conquest and political and social

unification. It breaks down into disruption and decadence. Local

autonomy with large centers of population characterize the Urbanist.

The Imperialist is a great military Empire, which was superseded, in

1532, by the Spanish Colonial period.

Archaeologists and historians alike have limited the Inca rule

exclusively to the Imperialist and generally date it around 1440. Had

they read the Inca history they would have found that the entire

Climactic Era, beginning shortly after 500 A.D. belongs to the Incas.

Sarmiento de Gamboa commences Inca rule in 565 A.D. And rightly so. The

history