| Home Page | Articles by
Author | Articles by
Subject | Search
|

You
can save this page as a text file from your browser (File /
Save As) and read it off-line. It is about 16K.

Right Division

by E.W. Bullinger
The
one great requirement of the Word is grounded on the fact that it is "the
Word of truth." And this fact is so stated as to imply that, unless the
Word is thus rightly divided we shall not get "truth"; and that we shall
get its truth only in proportion to the measure in which we divide it
rightly. The Requirement is thus stated in II Tim. 2:15: "Give diligence
to present thyself approved to God, a workman having no cause to be
ashamed rightly dividing the word of truth."

The word in
question here orthotomounta. As this word occurs in no Greek
writer, or even elsewhere in the New Testament, we can get little or no
help from outside, and are confined to Biblical usage.

It is used twice in the Septuagint for the
Hebrew vashar, to be right, or straight. In Prov. 3:6; 11:5, the
Hebrew is Piel ,to make right (as in II Chron. 23:30; Prov. 15:21;
Isa. 40:3; 45:2,13). But it is the Greek word that we have to do with
here, in II Tim. 2:15; and we cannot get away from the fact that temno
means to cut; or, from the fact that we cannot cut without dividing.
To dividebelongs to the very nature of the act of cutting.Even as applied
to directing one's way it implies that we divide off one way from others
-- because we desire to follow the right way and avoid the wrong.

The only Biblical guide we have to the usage
of the word is in Prov. 3:6, "In all thy ways acknowledge him And he shall
direct thy paths." In the margin the R.V. gives, "make straight or plain"
as an alternative rendering for "direct." But our ways can only be made
straight or plain by God's causing us to proceed on our Way aright --
i.e., by avoiding all the ways that are wrong, and going in the one way
that is right; in other words, the right way is divided off from all the
wrong ways.
What else can the word mean in II
Tim. 2:15? It matters little what others have thought or said. We could
fill a page with their names and their views, but we should learn but
little and only become confused. The duties of Priests, Furriers, and
Ploughmen have been referred to as indicating the correct meaning. But we
need not leave the Biblical usage, which associates the word with
guidance in the right way.
The scope of
the verse plainly teaches that:

Our one great study is to seek God's approval, and not man's.

We are to show all diligence in pursuing this study.

As workmen, our aim is to have no cause to be ashamed of our work.

In order to gain God's approval and avert our own shame we must
rightly divide the word of truth.

To do this we must direct our studies in theright way.

This great requirement is associated with the Word in its special
character as being the Word of truth; i.e., "the true
Word."

All this tells us that we shall not get the truth if we
do not thus rightly divide it; and that we shall get the truth only in
proportion to our "rightly dividing" it.
Other
titles of the Word have their own special requirements. As "the engrafted
Word" it must be received with meekness (Jas. 1:21). As "the
Faithful Word" we must hold it fast (Tit. 1:9). As " the Word of
life" we must hold it forth (Phil. 2:16). But, because this is "the
Word of truth," its paths must be well noted, the sign-posts must be
observed, the directions and guides which are in the Word itself must be
followed. We are to "give diligence" to this great Requirement of the Word
just because it is "the Word of truth."

Rightly dividing the Word as to its Subject
Matter
It is the common belief that every part of the Bible is to
be interpreted directly as referring to the Church of God; or as
pertaining to every person, at every stage of the world's history. This
neglect of the precept to rightly divide it is an effectual bar to the
right understanding of it, and to our enjoyment in its study. This
non-understanding of the Word is the explanation of its neglect, and this
neglect is the reason why so many who should be feeding on the spiritual
food of the Word are so ill-fed in themselves; and so ill-furnished for
every good work (II Tim. 3:17). While the Word of God is written
for all persons, and for all time, yet it is as true that
not every part of it is addressed to all persons or about
all persons in all time.

Three distinct classes of persons
Every word
is "written for our learning," and contains what all ought to know:
yet, its subject-matter is written according to the principle involved in
I Cor. 10:32, and is written concerning one or other of three distinct
classes of persons:
"The
Jews,
The Gentiles,

and The Church of God."
According to
the general belief, everything that goes to make up the subject-matter of
the Word of God is about only one of these three: and, whatever may be
said about the other two (the Jews and the Gentiles), all is to be
interpreted of only the one, viz., the Church of God. This comes of that
inbred selfishness which pertains to human nature: which, doing with this
as with all beside, is ever ready to appropriate that which belongs to
others. But no greater impediment to a right understanding of the Word
could possibly be devised.
We are quite aware
that, in saying this, we lay ourselves open to the charge which has been
made by some, that we are "robbing them of their Bible." But the charge is
groundless; and it arises from a total misapprehension of what we mean, or
from a perversion of what we have said. It is necessary, therefore, for us
to repeat, and to state categorically our belief that every word from
Genesis to Revelation is written for the Church of God. There is
not one word that we can do without: not one word that we can dispense
with, without loss. We deprive no one of any portion of the Word of Truth.
We protest against robbery in this sphere, as in all others.

It is not we who rob the Church of God; but it
is they who rob the Jews and the Gentiles. We would fain restore stolen
property to the rightful owners; property which has been stolen by the
very persons who charge us with robbery! We may indeed retort in the words
of Rom. 2:21: "Thou that preachest a man should not steal, Dost thou
steal? " We are prepared to make this counter-charge, and to sustain it.
The charge against us we disclaim; while those who make it are themselves
guilty of the very offence for which they condemn us.

We hold that what is written to and about the
Jew, belongs to and must be interpreted of the Jew. We hold that what is
written of and about the Gentile; belongs to and must be interpreted of
the Gentile. We hold that what is written to and about the Church of God,
belongs to and must be interpreted of the Church of God. Is this robbery?
or, Is it justice? Is it stealing? or, Is it
restitution?
Evidence of the misappropriation
(to use a milder term) is furnished by the Bible which lies open before
us. In speaking of the page-headings of Isa. 29 and 30, in our current
editions of the English Bibles (KJV), in which the former is declared to
be " Judgment upon Jerusalem"; and the latter, "God's mercies to
his church." . What is this but not only wrongly dividing the Word of
truth, but the introduction of error, by robbing Jerusalem of her promised
"mercies" and appropriating these stolen mercies to the Church? while the
"judgments" are left for Jerusalem, just as burglars take away what is
portable, and leave behind what they do not want or cannot carry away.

We believe God when He says that the Visions
shown to Isaiah were "concerning Judah and Jerusalem" (Isa. 1:1).
True, they were written for us; and "for our learning " (Rom.
15:4); but they are not addressed to us, or written
concerning us, but "concerning Judah and Jerusalem."

It would be an act of dishonesty, therefore,
for us thus to appropriate, by interpreting of ourselves, that which was
spoken of Israel. In like manner, if we take, as some do, the words of the
Epistle to the Ephesians as though they were written to or concerning the
Gentiles (or the unconverted world), then we not only rob the Church of
God of its most precious heritage, but we teach the ''Universal Fatherhood
of God" instead of His Fatherhood of only those who are His children in
Christ Jesus. It will thus be seen that unless we rightly divide the
subject-matter of the Word of truth we shall not get the truth, but shall
get error instead.
Every part of the Bible is
written "concerning" one or other of these three divisions, or classes of
persons. Sometimes in the same passage or book there may be that which is
concerning all three. Sometimes a whole book may be concerning only one of
these three, and the other two be altogether excluded. We may all three
learn much from what is written of only the one; for the inspired,
God-breathed Word is "profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for
correction, for instruction," for all who shall read it (II Tim.
3:16). That which happened to Israel happened unto them for
ensamples; "and they are written for our admonition " (1 Cor.
10:11). "Whatsoever was written aforetime was written for our
learning" (Rom. 15:4).
But while this is so,
and remains true; what we mean is that every Scripture is written
concerning one or other of these three classes; and is especially
addressed to that particular class. This class has therefore the
prior claim to that Scripture. The interpretation of it belongs to
that class; while the other two may apply it to themselves, and are to
learn from it. But, inasmuch as it is only an application and not
the interpretation, such application must be made only so
far as it agrees with the interpretation of those Scriptures which are
specially addressed to and relate to such class. Otherwise we shall find
ourselves using one truth to upset another truth; we shall be setting what
is true of one class in opposition to what is true of another class.

All that we are concerned with now is the
right dividing of the subject-matter of the Bible, which is
three-fold. And the great requirement of the Word as to this is, that we
should, and must, whenever we study any portion of the Word of God, ask
the question,

"Concerning whom is this
written?"    Whichever of the three it
may be, we must be careful to confine and limit the interpretation
of that passage to the class whom it concerns; while we may make any
application of it to ourselves so long as it does not conflict with
what is written elsewhere concerning "the church of God."

We must not take that which concerns the Jew
and interpret it of the Church. We must not take that which concerns the
Church and interpret it of the world. We must not take what is said
concerning the Gentile and interpret it of the Church. If we do, we shall
get darkness instead of light, confusion instead of instruction, trouble
instead of peace, and error instead of truth.

The Bible text in this publication, except where otherwise
indicated, is from the King James Version. This article appears on the
site: http://www.peterwade.com/

Would you like your own copy of books by E.W. Bullinger and other
authors? Go to our Selected
Books.

| Home Page | Articles by
Author | Articles by
Subject | Search |

This page Copyright © 2005, Positive Word Ministries
Inc. Email
us!
On the web since October 1995.